Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes

dc.contributor.authorSharon B. Poizner
dc.contributor.authorW. Alan Nicewander
dc.contributor.authorCharles F. Gettys
dc.date.accessioned2016-01-14T19:52:56Z
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-30T15:36:35Z
dc.date.available2016-01-14T19:52:56Z
dc.date.available2016-03-30T15:36:35Z
dc.date.issued1978-01-01
dc.description.abstractBinary, probability, and ordinal scoring proce dures for multiple-choice items were examined. In a situation where true scores were experimentally controlled by the manipulation of partial informa tion, it was found that both the probability and or dinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. A second experiment using vocabulary items and standard reliability estimation procedures also showed higher reliability for the two partial information scoring methods relative to binary scoring.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttps://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/manuscript-submission-guidelinesen_US
dc.identifier.citationPoizner, S. B., Nicewander, W. A., & Gettys, C. F. (1978). Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 83-96. doi: 10.1177/014662167800200109en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/014662167800200109en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/24974
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherApplied Psychological Measurement
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjecten_US
dc.titleAlternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modesen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
10.1177.014662167800200109.pdf
Size:
892.28 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format