Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes

Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Authors

Sharon B. Poizner
W. Alan Nicewander
Charles F. Gettys

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Applied Psychological Measurement

Abstract

Binary, probability, and ordinal scoring proce dures for multiple-choice items were examined. In a situation where true scores were experimentally controlled by the manipulation of partial informa tion, it was found that both the probability and or dinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. A second experiment using vocabulary items and standard reliability estimation procedures also showed higher reliability for the two partial information scoring methods relative to binary scoring.

Description

Keywords

Citation

Poizner, S. B., Nicewander, W. A., & Gettys, C. F. (1978). Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 83-96. doi: 10.1177/014662167800200109

Related file

Notes

Endorsement

Review

Supplemented By

Referenced By

Collection Detail

# of Isolates from RBM

# of Isolates from TV8

Creative Commons license

Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States