Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes
Loading...
Date
Authors
Sharon B. Poizner
W. Alan Nicewander
Charles F. Gettys
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Applied Psychological Measurement
Abstract
Binary, probability, and ordinal scoring proce dures for multiple-choice items were examined. In a situation where true scores were experimentally controlled by the manipulation of partial informa tion, it was found that both the probability and or dinal scoring systems were more reliable than the binary scoring method. A second experiment using vocabulary items and standard reliability estimation procedures also showed higher reliability for the two partial information scoring methods relative to binary scoring.
Description
Citation
Poizner, S. B., Nicewander, W. A., & Gettys, C. F. (1978). Alternative Response and Scoring Methods for Multiple-Choice Items: An Empirical Study of Probabilistic and Ordinal Response Modes. Applied Psychological Measurement, 2(1), 83-96. doi: 10.1177/014662167800200109
Related file
Notes
Collections
Endorsement
Review
Supplemented By
Referenced By
Collection Detail
# of Isolates from RBM
# of Isolates from TV8
Creative Commons license
Except where otherwised noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 3.0 United States
