Comparison of Interval Valued Pareto-Optimal Alternatives

dc.contributor.advisor	Barker, Kash
dc.contributor.author	Stewart, Andrew
dc.contributor.committeeMember	Raman, Shivakumar
dc.contributor.committeeMember	Nicholson, Charles
dc.date.accessioned	2016-12-16T17:23:50Z
dc.date.available	2016-12-16T17:23:50Z
dc.date.issued	2016
dc.date.manuscript	2016
dc.description.abstract	Everyday tradeoff decisions are made where criteria must be compared, evaluated, and decided upon. In real world applications, variables have an inherent amount of uncertainty that must be regarded when making a decision, especially when considering interval data alternatives. There exists a need to incorporate uncertainty into the decision-making process but there are few straightforward approaches to directly compare interval valued variables. In this thesis, an approach to compare non dominated interval valued alternatives is conducted using TOPSIS in order to determine the shortest path from source to sink in a construction network. Key Terms: Shortest Path, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, TOPSIS, Interval, Non dominated	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/11244/47066
dc.language	en_US	en_US
dc.subject	Shortest Path	en_US
dc.subject	Multi-Criteria Decision Making	en_US
dc.subject	TOPSIS	en_US
dc.subject	Interval	en_US
dc.subject	Non-dominated	en_US
dc.thesis.degree	Master of Science	en_US
dc.title	Comparison of Interval Valued Pareto-Optimal Alternatives	en_US
ou.group	College of Engineering::School of Industrial and Systems Engineering	en_US