A Tale of Two Pandemics and the Shortcomings of International Law: Examining gender-based violence in Bolivia in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic by scrutinizing international laws’ limitations in mitigating human rights abuses during periods of crisis
dc.contributor.advisor | Morais de Sa e Silva, Michelle | |
dc.contributor.author | Chamon, Micaela | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Costa Morais de Sa e Silva, Fabio | |
dc.contributor.committeeMember | Cruise, Rebecca | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-14T16:57:04Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-14T16:57:04Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2021-05 | |
dc.date.manuscript | 2021-05-03 | |
dc.description.abstract | International law was established as a part of the international relations sphere to prevent mass atrocity from ever occurring again in the way that it had throughout World War I and World War II. With the passage of time, it continued to evolve, seeking to address all issues, including human rights. Then, gender-based violence was defined and categorized as a human rights violation. Yet, although numerous international instruments have since been instituted to address and fight the issue, the prevalence of gender-based violence continues to plague communities worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic further exacerbated the issue of gender-based violence. This was mostly as a consequence of quarantine measures that sought to mitigate the public health crisis, since they confined women to their potential aggressors and left them with life-threatening choices – staying home and risking domestic violence or in the slight chance that they could, leaving and risking infection of the virus. As a result, domestic violence cases rose all over the world. This prompted a questioning of the true global impact that international law has, particularly in protecting women and their rights. In the case of Bolivia, a country where gender inequality and corruption are deeply rooted in its institutions, cultures, and traditions, accountability measures alone are unable to stop gender-based violence from taking the lives of women during normal circumstance. As a result, it has the most cases of gender-based violence in the continent, and in the case of COVID-19, a surge in those cases was also evident. This thesis, therefore, seeks to examine the interaction of COVID-19 and gender-based violence in Bolivia, and the shortcomings of international law to advocate for proactive measures and a re-evaluation of the elitist and quasi-judicial nature of international law related to this issue. | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11244/329569 | |
dc.language | en_US | en_US |
dc.subject | Gender-based violence | en_US |
dc.subject | International Law | en_US |
dc.subject | COVID-19 | en_US |
dc.subject | Bolivia | en_US |
dc.thesis.degree | Master of Arts in International Studies | en_US |
dc.title | A Tale of Two Pandemics and the Shortcomings of International Law: Examining gender-based violence in Bolivia in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic by scrutinizing international laws’ limitations in mitigating human rights abuses during periods of crisis | en_US |
ou.group | David L. Boren College of International Studies | en_US |
Files
License bundle
1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
- Name:
- license.txt
- Size:
- 1.71 KB
- Format:
- Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
- Description: