Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKaid, Lynda Lee,en_US
dc.contributor.authorBanwart, Mary Christine.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:18:34Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:18:34Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/464
dc.description.abstractBased on the results of the study, differences did emerge in the videostyles and webstyles of female and male candidates in 2000. For example, female candidate videostyle differed from male candidate videostyle in a more "politically sophisticated" manner that blended the strategic strengths of a variety of candidacies. Male candidates differed from female candidates in a more "personal leader" videostyle that encouraged voter identification and yet emphasized legitimate leadership. While few differences were detected between female candidate webstyle and male candidate webstyle, female candidate webstyle differed from that of male candidates in a more "feminine personal-professional" style and male candidate webstyle differed from that of female candidates in a more "masculine up-front" style.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe results from the comparison of female candidate videostyle and webstyle and male candidate videostyle and webstyle indicated that significant differences did emerge in the self-presentation strategies used by both female and male candidates on each medium. However, although differences emerged, the characteristics that differentiated a candidate's videostyle from webstyle can be more fully explained by the medium constraints than by the influence of gender. This study therefore posits that such differences suggest female candidates may have finally found ground that provides an equal level on which to present the image of a political leader.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis content analysis examines the self-presentation strategies of female and male political candidates in mixed-gender gubernatorial, U.S. Senate, and U.S. House races during the general cycle of campaign 2000. By selecting the televised spot ads from these three levels of office, this study first expands the prior research on female and male candidate videostyle to offer a complete analysis of female and male videostyles in major level races. Second, based on the foundation of videostyle, this study proposes a systematic method---webstyle---by which to analyze candidate self-presentation on the Internet. Third, this study explores how gender influences candidate image development across a traditional medium and a relatively new, complex multi-media environment.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 363 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectSpeech Communication.en_US
dc.subjectWomen Political activity United States.en_US
dc.subjectInternet in political campaigns United States.en_US
dc.subjectCommunication in politics United States Sex differences.en_US
dc.subjectTelevision in politics United States.en_US
dc.subjectAdvertising, Political United States.en_US
dc.titleVideostyle and webstyle in 2000: Comparing the gender differences of candidate presentations in political advertising and on the Internet.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Communicationen_US
dc.noteAdviser: Lynda Lee Kaid.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-03, Section: A, page: 0816.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3045842en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Communication


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record