Executive budget success: Evidence from the American states.
Abstract
Budgeting is among the executive's most important powers in a separated political system. The extent to which executive budget proposals are adopted by the legislature is an important measure of the executive's political success. Scholarly literature on budgeting has emphasized how budgets are created but study of executive budget success and its causes is relatively rare. This work seeks to better understand success and the reasons it is achieved through an analysis of the 50 American states for a complete budget cycle. This approach advances the study of budget success by using multiple methods, including measuring success by major issue as well as agency budgets. A survey of budget participants revealed that governors were more successful with partisan support in the legislature, early in their terms, and in a biennial budget cycle. Respondents rated economic conditions, clearly stating and advocating an agenda, and offering popular issues the most important factors contributing to executive budget success. Quantitative analyses revealed that governors were more likely to achieve budget goals with a less professional legislature, legislative term limits, party support in the legislature, biennial budgeting, popular support, and earlier in their terms. Taken together, all analyses suggest that the most important factor in executive budget success is the time in service, followed by partisan support in the legislature, an institutionally weak legislature, biennial budgets, popular support, control over a strong executive budget office, a weak economy, and when proposing large budget increases.
Collections
- OU - Dissertations [9426]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
State claims. Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Treasury transmitting the report of the Third Auditor and Second Comptroller, making allowances to the State of Massachusetts of $26,228.44, and the State of Pennsylvania of $7,546.83, on account of "refunding to States expenses incurred in raising volunteers," and to the State of Texas $148,615.97, on account of "re-imbursement to certain States and Territories for expenses incurred in repelling invasions and suppressing Indian hostilities.".
House of Representatives Executive Document No. 413, 51st Congress, 1st Session (1890) (1890-06-12) -
Indian Trust Bonds. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, stating the amount of bonds of the State of Virginia, and bonds of other corporations guaranteed by the State of Virginia, held by the United States in trust for certain Indian tribes, and asking for authority to dispose of the same.
House of Representatives Executive Document No. 72, 38th Congress, 2nd Session (1865) (1865-02-23) -
Letter from the Secretary of War, transmitting report of Lieut. Thomas H. Bradley, examiner of state claims, on the claims of states against the United States, in response to an inquiry from the Committee on Claims, United States Senate
Senate Executive Document No. 74, 46th Congress, 2nd Session (1880) (1880-02-09)