Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBatioja, Kelsi
dc.contributor.authorNguyen, Tiffany
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, J. Michael
dc.contributor.authorDetweiler, Byron
dc.contributor.authorChecketts, Jake
dc.contributor.authorTorgerson, Trevor
dc.contributor.authorHartwell, Micah
dc.contributor.authorVassar, Matt
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-12T16:44:48Z
dc.date.available2023-09-12T16:44:48Z
dc.date.issued2022-02-18
dc.identifierouhd_Batioja_analysisofevidenceunderpinning_2022
dc.identifier.citationBatioja, K., Nguyen, T., Anderson, J. M., Detweiler, B., Checketts, J., Torgerson, T., Hartwell, M., & Vassar, M. (2022, February 18). An analysis of the evidence underpinning the American Academy Orthopaedic Surgery Pediatrics Clinical Practice Guidelines. Poster presented at Research Days at Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences, Tulsa, Ok.
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/339509
dc.description.abstractBackground: Randomized control trials (RCTs) serve as evidentiary support for recommendations underpinning clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) with the goal of optimizing patient care. A knowledge gap exists within scientific literature when evaluating the methodological quality and reporting of RCTs. This is especially notable within the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgery (AAOS) CPGs. We aim to evaluate the methodological quality and reporting, as well as, analyze risk of bias of RCTs underlying recommendations within AAOS Pediatric CPGs.
dc.description.abstractStudy Design: We located all AAOS Pediatric CPGs using OrthoGuidelines.org. Each CPG was evaluated for RCTs cited within the references. Descriptive statistics were recorded and multiple regressions were used to account for whether publication year, intervention type, funding, conflict of interest statement and risk of bias accounted for variance in CONSORT scores. A Mann-Whitney analysis was completed to compare CONSORT studies published before and after 2010.
dc.description.abstractResults: Mean CONSORT adherence was 69.8% of the 23 RCTs evaluated. Items of the lowest CONSORT adherence included items 10, 23, and 24 while items 2a, 13a, and 18 showed the highest adherence. Ten RCTs (43.5%) had “low” risk of bias while 5 RCTs (21.7%) were of “some concerns,” and 8 RCTs (34.8%) received a “high” designation for risk of bias. There were no statistically significant associations in the bivariate regression analysis. The Mann-Whitney analysis revealed no significant difference between studies published before and after 2010.
dc.description.abstractConclusions: Our results suggest that CONSORT adherence within the RCTs of the AAOS Pediatric CPGs is suboptimal —relying on evidence that, in some cases, is more than 20 years old. Many of the RCTs cited as supporting evidence have increased risk of bias. Altogether, these CPGs may need to be updated or expanded to include more recent evidence relevant to pediatric orthopedic surgery.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherOklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
dc.rightsThe author(s) retain the copyright or have the right to deposit the item giving the Oklahoma State University Library a limited, non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Resources and Discovery Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleAnalysis of the evidence underpinning the American Academy Orthopaedic Surgery pediatrics clinical practice guidelines
osu.filenameouhd_Batioja_analysisofevidenceunderpinning_2022.pdf
dc.type.genrePresentation
dc.type.materialText
dc.subject.keywordsCONSORT
dc.subject.keywordsclinical practice guideline
dc.subject.keywordsquality


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record