Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMendoza, Jorge
dc.creatorFife, Dustin
dc.date.accessioned2019-04-27T21:38:50Z
dc.date.available2019-04-27T21:38:50Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier995274302042
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/319258
dc.description.abstractMany have commented on potential problems associated with using under- graduate psychology students as research participants (e.g. Arnett, 2008; Hen- rich, Heine, & Norenzayan, 2010; Highhouse & Gillespie, 2009; Rosenthal & Ros- now, 1969). However, little research has been directed at demonstrating the extent of bias that may result from such practices and how to address this bias. In this dissertation, I investigate how the F statistic and treatment effects are affected when researchers use a convenience sample. I show that without measur- ing and modeling the selection variable, these parameter estimates are biased. I also show that covariate adjustments can mitigate bias when interactions do not occur between the treatment effect(s) and the selection variable. When interac- tions do exist, however, it is impossible to eliminate bias, particularly for the F statistic.
dc.format.extent44 pages
dc.format.mediumapplication.pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.relation.requiresAdobe Acrobat Reader
dc.subjectAnalysis of variance
dc.subjectAnalysis of covariance
dc.subjectMathematical statistics
dc.titleTHE ACHILLES HEEL OF PSYCHOLOGY: HOW CONVENIENCE SAMPLING AFFECTS PARAMETER ESTIMATES
dc.typetext
dc.typedocument
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record