Associations Between Two Athlete Monitoring Systems Used to Quantify External Training Loads in Basketball Players

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorHeishman, Aaron
dc.contributor.authorPeak, Keldon
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Ryan
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Brady
dc.contributor.authorDaub, Bryce
dc.contributor.authorFreitas, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorBemben, Michael G.
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T18:15:16Z
dc.date.available2020-05-20T18:15:16Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-11
dc.description.abstractMonitoring external training load (eTL) has become popular for team sport for managing fatigue, optimizing performance, and guiding return-to-play protocols. During indoor sports, eTL can be measured via inertial measurement units (IMU) or indoor positioning systems (IPS). Though each device provides unique information, the relationships between devices has not been examined. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to assess the association of eTL between an IMU and IPS used to monitor eTL in team sport. Retrospective analyses were performed on 13 elite male National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I basketball players (age: 20.2 ± 1.2 years, height: 201.1 ± 7.6 cm, mass: 96.8 ± 8.8 kg) from three practices during the off-season training phase. A one-way analysis of variance was used to test differences in eTL across practices. Pearson’s correlation examined the association between the Distance traveled during practice captured by IPS compared to PlayerLoad (PL), PlayerLoad per Minute (PL/Min), 2-Dimensional PlayerLoad (PL2D), 1-Dimensional PlayerLoad Forward (PL1D-FWD), Side (PL1D-SIDE), and Up (PL1D-UP) captured from the IMU. Regression analyses were performed to predict PL from Distance traveled. The eTL characteristics during Practice 1: PL = 420.4 ± 102.9, PL/min = 5.8 ± 1.4, Distance = 1645.9 ± 377.0 m; Practice 2: PL = 472.8 ± 109.5, PL/min = 5.1 ± 1.2, Distance = 1940.0 ± 436.3 m; Practice 3: PL = 295.1 ± 57.8, PL/min = 5.3 ± 1.0, Distance = 1198.2 ± 219.2 m. Significant (p ≤ 0.05) differences were observed in PL, PL2D, PL1D-FWD, PL1D-SIDE, PL1D-UP, and Distance across practices. Significant correlations (p ≤ 0.001) existed between Distance and PL parameters (Practice 1: r = 0.799–0.891; Practice 2: r = 0.819–0.972; and Practice 3: 0.761–0.891). Predictive models using Distance traveled accounted for 73.5–89.7% of the variance in PL. Significant relationships and predictive capacities exists between systems. Nonetheless, each system also appears to capture unique information that may still be useful to performance practitioners regarding the understanding of eTL.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.sponsorshipOpen Access fees paid for in whole or in part by the University of Oklahoma Libraries.en_US
dc.identifier.citationHeishman, A.; Peak, K.; Miller, R.; Brown, B.; Daub, B.; Freitas, E.; Bemben, M. 2020. Associations Between Two Athlete Monitoring Systems Used to Quantify External Training Loads in Basketball Players. Sports, 8, 33.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/sports8030033en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/324425
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.rightsAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectathlete monitoringen_US
dc.subjectinertial measurement uniten_US
dc.subjectultra-wide banden_US
dc.subjectaccelerometeren_US
dc.subjectPlayerLoaden_US
dc.subjectShotTrackeren_US
dc.subjectteam sport monitoringen_US
dc.subjectoff-season trainingen_US
dc.titleAssociations Between Two Athlete Monitoring Systems Used to Quantify External Training Loads in Basketball Playersen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Health and Exercise Scienceen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Heishman_etal_2020_AssociationsBetweenTwoAthleteMonitoringSystemsUsedtoQuantifyExternalTrainingLoadsinBasketballPlayers.pdf
Size:
690.55 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

OU - Faculty and Staff Publications