Neural Responses to Truth Telling and Risk Propensity under Asymmetric Information

dc.contributor.authorHideo Suzuki
dc.contributor.authorMasaya Misaki
dc.contributor.authorFrank Krueger
dc.contributor.authorJerzy Bodurka
dc.date.accessioned2017-03-05T22:55:10Z
dc.date.available2017-03-05T22:55:10Z
dc.date.issued2015-09-01
dc.descriptionThis research was supported by the Laureate Institute for Brain Research and the William K. Warren Foundation. The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.en_US
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractTrust is multi-dimensional because it can be characterized by subjective trust, trust antecedent, and behavioral trust. Previous research has investigated functional brain responses to subjective trust (e.g., a judgment of trustworthiness) or behavioral trust (e.g., decisions to trust) in perfect information, where all relevant information is available to all participants. In contrast, we conducted a novel examination of the patterns of functional brain activity to a trust antecedent, specifically truth telling, in asymmetric information, where one individual has more information than others, with the effect of varying risk propensity. We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and recruited 13 adults, who played the Communication Game, where they served as the “Sender” and chose either truth telling (true advice) or lie telling (false advice) regarding the best payment allocation for their partner. Our behavioral results revealed that subjects with recreational high risk tended to choose true advice. Moreover, fMRI results yielded that the choices of true advice were associated with increased cortical activation in the anterior rostral medial and frontopolar prefrontal cortices, middle frontal cortex, temporoparietal junction, and precuneus. Furthermore, when we specifically evaluated a role of the bilateral amygdala as the region of interest (ROI), decreased amygdala response was associated with high risk propensity, regardless of truth telling or lying. In conclusion, our results have implications for how differential functions of the cortical areas may contribute to the neural processing of truth telling.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.description.peerreviewnoteshttp://www.plosone.org/static/editorial#peeren_US
dc.identifier.citationSuzuki H, Misaki M, Krueger F, Bodurka J (2015) Neural Responses to Truth Telling and Risk Propensity under Asymmetric Information. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137014. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0137014en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0137014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/49271
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPLos One
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPLoS ONE 10(9): e0137014
dc.relation.urihttp://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0137014
dc.rightsAttribution 3.0 United States
dc.rights.requestablefalseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/
dc.subjectAmygdala,Asymmetric information,Decision making,Functional magnetic resonance imaging,Prefrontal cortex,Frontal lobe,Games,Behavioren_US
dc.titleNeural Responses to Truth Telling and Risk Propensity under Asymmetric Informationen_US
dc.typeResearch Articleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0137014.pdf
Size:
1.62 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format