Reflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5

dc.contributor.authorFrazier, Abby G.
dc.contributor.authorLustig, Allyza R.
dc.contributor.authorChang, Michael
dc.contributor.authorLias, Emile H.
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, Renee A.
dc.contributor.authorKeener, Victoria W.
dc.contributor.authorGrecni, Zena N.
dc.contributor.authorHuntington, Henry P.
dc.contributor.authorMecray, Ellen L.
dc.contributor.authorWood, Kimberly M.
dc.contributor.authorDello, Kathie D.
dc.contributor.authorChardón-Maldonado, Patricia
dc.contributor.authorWhite, Dave D.
dc.date.accessioned2026-09-21T18:23:47Z
dc.date.issued2025-03-27
dc.description.abstractRegional chapters in the National Climate Assessment (NCA) report provide a comprehensive synthesis of how climate change is impacting United States regions and are extensively used to support climate change decision-making by local communities and policymakers. The regional chapter author teams are tasked with assessing the climate trends, risks, and responses across a range of sectors and across a vast and diverse geography, while making content locally relevant. Regional chapters have evolved in many ways since the third NCA (NCA3), often shifting from focusing on climate stressors and hazards to addressing more diverse human-centric impacts (e.g., human health), inequities, and other barriers to action. The fifth NCA (NCA5) author teams were constructed to be intentionally diverse, including more social scientists and cultural practitioners. Here, regional chapter authors provide reflections on the assessment process and identify some best practices for developing an effective regional chapter. These include building a diverse and complementary author team, utilizing technical contributors to enhance the technical and geographical expertise of the team, and conducting extensive public engagement with local communities and policymakers throughout the process. To improve future regional NCA chapters, we identify several recommendations: (1) thoughtful analysis and possible revision of regional boundaries, (2) inclusion of authors from underrepresented regions on national-scale topic chapters, (3) structured cross-chapter engagement among regional chapters, (4) a holistic communications plan for the post-release period, and (5) better coordination with sub-national climate assessments.
dc.description.notes© The Author(s) 2025. The version of record of this article, first published in Climate Change, is available online at Publisher’s website: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03874-y
dc.description.peerreviewYes
dc.identifier.citationFrazier, A.G., Lustig, A.R., Chang, M. et al. Reflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5. Climatic Change 178, 72 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-025-03874-y
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10584-025-03874-y
dc.identifier.urihttps://shareok.org/handle/11244/342952
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Nature
dc.relation.ispartofClimatic Change
dc.relation.ispartofseries178(72)
dc.relation.urihttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10584-025-03874-y#citeas
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
dc.subjectRegional climate change
dc.subjectEquity
dc.subjectClimate assessment
dc.subjectClimate impacts
dc.subjectActionable science
dc.titleReflections on preparing regional chapters for NCA5
dc.typeArticle
ou.groupCollege of Atmospheric & Geographic Sciences::Department of Geography and Environmental Sustainability

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
s10584-025-03874-y.pdf
Size:
2.03 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format