Socially Sustainable Solutions for Natural Hazards and Utility Resilience

dc.contributor.authorLeon-Corwin, Maggie
dc.contributor.authorMuraleetharan, K.K. "Muralee"
dc.contributor.authorHarvey, Philip Scott Jr.
dc.contributor.authorMoses, Paul
dc.contributor.authorBahrami, Omid
dc.contributor.authorCampos, Richard
dc.contributor.authorDiodosio, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorFang, Shanmin
dc.contributor.authorJason C. Furtado
dc.contributor.authorKAYS, H M IMRAN
dc.contributor.authorMalloy, Christopher
dc.contributor.authorMartin, Elinor
dc.contributor.authorMeyers, Chris
dc.contributor.authorLong, Michael A.
dc.contributor.authorMiller, Gerald
dc.contributor.authorMomin, Khondhaker Al
dc.contributor.authorNazaripouya, Hamid
dc.contributor.authorPanchalogaranjan, Vinushika
dc.contributor.authorPeach, Kaitlin
dc.contributor.authorPuxley, Bryony
dc.contributor.authorSadri, Arif
dc.contributor.authorSchumaker, Nick
dc.contributor.authorYang, Jia
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-06T19:25:59Z
dc.date.available2026-02-06T19:25:59Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThe ninth and final chapter of the S3OK Framework presents collaborative efforts from the Natural Hazards and Utility Resilience working group from the S3OK project. This chapter documents how sustained collaboration between researchers and utility partners emerged from a multi-year stakeholder engagement process and enabled data sharing, co-produced tools, and actionable insights for managing increasingly complex hazard risks, all in support of identifying socially sustainable solutions for challenges at the nexus of natural hazards and electric utilities. This chapter synthesizes four interrelated problem domains shaping utility vulnerability: the embeddedness of infrastructure within social and organizational systems; ice storms as high-impact, low-probability stress tests of grid fragility; extreme temperature events that generate cascading failures across energy and water systems; and the growing wildfire threat driven by precipitation “whiplash,” vegetation dynamics, and climate variability. This chapter also highlights key scientific advances with operational relevance for utilities, including probabilistic frameworks for ice-storm resilience, subseasonal-to-seasonal forecasting to anticipate peak demand and cold-air outbreaks, hazard mapping tailored to rural cooperatives, and optimization tools for photovoltaic hosting capacity and grid protection during distributed energy expansion. Social science research demonstrates that public risk perception, trust, and willingness to pay shape the political feasibility of grid hardening and resilience investments. Together, these interdisciplinary products and partnerships offer a transferable model for co-producing climate-informed, socially durable strategies to enhance utility resilience, manage cascading infrastructure risks, and support equitable, forward-looking resilience planning in hazard-prone regions.
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Science Foundation (Grant No. OIA-1946093) through the Established Program to Stimulate Competitive Research (EPSCoR). The Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education.
dc.identifier.urihttps://shareok.org//handle/11244/341835
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
dc.subjectNatural Hazards
dc.subjectUtility Resilience
dc.subjectInterdisciplinary Collaboration
dc.subjectOklahoma
dc.titleSocially Sustainable Solutions for Natural Hazards and Utility Resilience
dc.title.alternativeChapter 9: Socially Sustainable Solutions for Natural Hazards and Utility Resilience
dc.typeBook chapter

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Leon-Corwin, Muraleetharan, Harvey, and Moses et al. 2026.pdf
Size:
4.75 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.01 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: