Adaptive Inference Under Distribution Shift: Conditional Diffusion, Test-Time Compute, and Selective Attention
Date
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Item Statistics
- Total Views: 16
- Total Downloads: 129
- Views in the Last Month: 8
Abstract
Distribution shift manifests differently across machine learning domains, shaping both the challenge and the solution in each case. In wireless channel estimation, the shift is continuous and physical: user mobility induces time-varying Doppler dynamics that evolve channel statistics on the timescale of seconds. In mathematical reasoning, shift is discrete and semantic: problem difficulty varies across instances in ways not observable from the input, so a system cannot know in advance how much computation a problem warrants. In medical imaging, shift is institutional and acquisitional: heterogeneity in scanner hardware and patient populations produces covariate shift, with pathological patterns appearing at varying scales and locations. Despite these differences, a common failure mode unites the three settings: static inference that commits to fixed computational strategies wastes resources when conditions are favorable and underperforms when they are demanding. This thesis develops adaptive inference mechanisms built on a shared principle of conditioning computational allocation on input-dependent signals, instantiated differently in each domain: for wireless channels as signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) combined with a learned temporal context; for large language model (LLM) reasoning as an intermediate quality signal from a learned Process Reward Model (PRM) evaluating trajectories in progress; and for medical imaging as a spatial attention signal concentrating capacity on diagnostically relevant regions. Empirically, a conditional diffusion framework achieves −17.3 dB mean normalized mean square error (NMSE) on 3GPP Urban Microcell (UMi) benchmarks; a verifier-guided adaptive test-time compute framework improves Llama-3.1-8B accuracy from 43.8% to 65.4% on MATH-500; and ZoomFormer achieves F1 = 0.899 on HLung-6 with only 4.23M parameters, outperforming substantially larger baselines.