Is a different perspective helpful? Assessing the validity of peer ratings of goal orientation.

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorDay, Eric A.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorEspejo, Jazmine.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:20:03Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:20:03Z
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.description.abstractThe present study was the first to examine the validity of peer ratings of goal orientation. I examined peer-assessed goal orientation in a collaborative training environment with a complex task. The reliability and structural, convergent, discriminant, and predictive validity of peer ratings were examined. Regarding predictive validity, I examined the incremental contribution of peer ratings above and beyond self ratings in the prediction of skill acquisition and post-training self-efficacy. The results showed that (1) self and peer ratings have similarly high levels of internal consistency, (2) there is little agreement and convergence between self and peer ratings, (3) self and peer ratings have similar structures, and (4) peer ratings provide incremental validity beyond both self ratings and prior performance in predicting future skill acquisition and post-training self-efficacy.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 54 leaves :en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/987
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-01, Section: B, page: 0586.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Eric A. Day.en_US
dc.subjectGoal (Psychology)en_US
dc.subjectPeer review in psychology.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Industrial.en_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Psychologyen_US
dc.titleIs a different perspective helpful? Assessing the validity of peer ratings of goal orientation.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychology
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3207059en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
3207059.PDF
Size:
641.31 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

OU - Dissertations