On the Methodological and Normative Foundations of Probabilism

dc.contributor.advisorHawthorne, James
dc.contributor.authorEpley, Patrick
dc.contributor.committeeMemberEllis, Stephen
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMontminy, Martin
dc.contributor.committeeMemberRiggs, Wayne
dc.contributor.committeeMemberTerry, Robert
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-16T21:52:05Z
dc.date.available2015-12-16T21:52:05Z
dc.date.issued2015-12-18
dc.date.manuscript2015
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is an elaboration and defense of probabilism, the view that belief comes in various degrees of strength, and that the probability calculus provides coherence norms for these degrees of belief. Probabilism faces several well-known objections. For example, critics object that probabilism’s numerical representation of degrees of belief is too precise, and that its coherence norms are too demanding for real human agents to follow. While probabilists have developed several plausible responses to these objections, the compatibility among these responses is unclear. On this basis, I argue that probabilists must articulate unified methodological and normative foundations for their view, and I sketch the foundations of a probabilist modeling framework, the Comparative Confidence Framework (CCF). CCF characterizes probabilism primarily as an account of ideal degree of belief coherence. CCF provides a set of fundamentally qualitative and comparative—rather than quantitative—evaluative ideals for degree of belief coherence. By providing qualitative, comparative, evaluative coherence norms for degrees of belief, CCF avoids the aforementioned objections: that probabilism’s formal representation of degrees of belief is too precise, and that its norms are too demanding. CCF is a first step in the development of unified foundations for a wider subjectivist Bayesian theory of doxastic and pragmatic rationality.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/23304
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectprobabilismen_US
dc.subjectBayesianismen_US
dc.subjectcomparative confidenceen_US
dc.subjectcoherenceen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.titleOn the Methodological and Normative Foundations of Probabilismen_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Philosophyen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2015_Epley_Patrick_Dissertation.pdf
Size:
1.88 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
2015_Epley_Patrick_Dissertation.docx
Size:
226.32 KB
Format:
Microsoft Word XML
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: