Chasing the shadow: A heuristic look at reader-response.
| dc.contributor.advisor | Angelotti, Michael, | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Harris, Kim A. | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2013-08-16T12:20:23Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2013-08-16T12:20:23Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2006 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | What is the experience of reader-response from the learner's and teachers' perspectives? The purpose of the research reported here was to explore the students' and teachers' perspectives regarding literature and the reader-response experience adding their voices to the English/language arts debate. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Findings suggest the existence of a concrete manifestation of the reader-response experience, the necessity of authenticity and relatedness while reading and the desire to transfer knowledge acquired to others. While elements of the reader-response experience may be extracted from student depictions, this research shows that the environment in the English/language arts classroom is foundational to an extreme reader-response experience. Authenticity and relatedness alone will not offer a deep connection with the prose in the absence of a personal connection with the people in the environment in which the reader-response exploration takes place. An environment of nurtured acceptance and respect is foundational in cultivating a connected classroom reader-response experience. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Student and teacher perspectives are determined here by utilizing the Moustakas (1990) six-stage heuristic research design: initial engagement, immersion, incubation, illumination, explication, and creative synthesis. Student perspectives are determined through in-depth analysis of student responses to writing prompts, transcribed interview discussion, and observations of student discussions. Teacher perspectives are determined through in-depth analysis of teacher observations, interactions, and dialogue. | en_US |
| dc.format.extent | viii, 127 leaves ; | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/11244/1100 | |
| dc.note | Adviser: Michael Angelotti. | en_US |
| dc.note | Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 67-10, Section: A, page: 3745. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Education, Reading. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Reader-response criticism. | en_US |
| dc.subject | Literature Study and teaching (Secondary) | en_US |
| dc.subject | Education, Language and Literature. | en_US |
| dc.thesis.degree | Ph.D. | en_US |
| dc.thesis.degreeDiscipline | Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum | en_US |
| dc.title | Chasing the shadow: A heuristic look at reader-response. | en_US |
| dc.type | Thesis | en_US |
| ou.group | Jeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum | |
| ou.identifier | (UMI)AAI3237530 | en_US |
Files
Original bundle
1 - 1 of 1