The evaluation of a university-based acquaintance rape prevention program.

dc.contributor.advisorScherman, Avraham,en_US
dc.contributor.authorNortham, Edward John.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:29:51Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:29:51Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of one such prevention program. One hundred and eighty male students from a large midwestern university were divided into two groups (dormitory & ROTC) and were administered 3 outcome measures on attitudes across pre, post, and follow-up conditions using a Solomon four group design. In addition, due to the reactiveness to the topic of rape and the high face validity of the outcome measures, a social desirability scale was used to assess for the need for social acceptance.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe 1990's saw the development of acquaintance rape prevention programs in response to increased awareness of it's occurrence and impact on individuals. Prevention programs were developed with the intent of changing the attitudes of sexually aggressive males on the assumption that attitudes such as rape support, adversarial sexual beliefs, and acceptance of rape myths contribute to acquaintance rape.en_US
dc.description.abstractInterpretation of significance indicated that respondents' baseline scores were non-supportive of rape and showed decreasing support for rape across testing periods. The goal of evaluating the effectiveness of the prevention program was not reached because of the failure to identify the target population. Results point to the need for more accurate identification of sexually aggressive males prior to presentation of intervention, using evaluation components based on multiple construct theories of attitude and behavior in the assessment of programs, and designing programs based on current theories of persuasion and attitude change. Support is also given for continued use of social desirability measures and follow-up assessment to evaluate long term program impact.en_US
dc.description.abstractNo significant differences were found within the Solomon four group design nor with the measure for social desirability. Data were regrouped into a 2 x 3 (group x administration) design and significant interactions were found for 2 of the 3 outcome measures across post testing and follow-up and pretesting and follow-up conditions for the remaining measure. Significance was also found between the dormitory and ROTC group at the follow-up condition on all measures.en_US
dc.format.extentix, 85 leaves ;en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/11244/5540
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-09, Section: B, page: 5134.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Avraham Scherman.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Clinical.en_US
dc.subjectAcquaintance rape United States Prevention.en_US
dc.subjectWomen's Studies.en_US
dc.subjectWomen college students Crimes against United States.en_US
dc.subjectSociology, Criminology and Penology.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Social.en_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.titleThe evaluation of a university-based acquaintance rape prevention program.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychology
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9808398en_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
9808398.PDF
Size:
1.98 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format