Can authority influence misinformation?: the relationship between misinformation and eyewitness accuracy

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGayzur, Nora
dc.contributor.authorGill, Kaylie
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLimke-McLean, Alicia
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMabry, John
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-24T19:32:19Z
dc.date.available2022-08-24T19:32:19Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.description.abstractMistaken identification by eyewitnesses was involved in 72% of the cases where people were later exonerated by DNA testing (Smalarz & Wells, 2015). There has been a large movement in support of eyewitness being unreliable. Misinformation and the pitfalls of memory have been widely studied; however, an interesting avenue of thought is how might the presence of authority interact with these phenomena. While previous research studied how authority impacted memory, few studies have examined the role that individual differences in response to authority impacted memory. This study examined how authority and response to authority impacted eyewitness memory. One hundred twelve participants were randomly assigned to four conditions (high authority-leading questions, low authority-leading questions, high authority-nonleading questions, and low authority-nonleading questions). Participants watched a short video in which a bank robbery was committed. Participants were interviewed and asked leading or nonleading questions by a person with high or low authority. After, participants were asked to make a statement about any details they could remember. For interview accuracy, there was a main effect of question type. Participants demonstrated better recall for nonleading than leading questions. The finding replicates previous research that shows leading questions can create more misinformation that neutral questions. However, no other effects were found for the interview accuracy or the witness statement accuracy. Thus, it appears that authority and response to authority did not impact eyewitness memory. This could be due to a weak authority manipulation and that participants may need additional cues, such as uniform, to legitimize a persona as an authority figure. Thus, it could be that when examining characteristics of the interview (e.g., response to authority), there may be other systems impacting recall other than authority. Limitations and future directions are discussed.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc(OCoLC)1347000093
dc.identifier.other(AlmaMMSId)9982882608702196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/336503
dc.rightsAll rights reserved by the author, who has granted UCO Chambers Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its online repositories. Contact UCO Chambers Library's Digital Initiatives Working Group at diwg@uco.edu for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.subject.keywordsPsychology
dc.subject.keywordsAttitudes
dc.subject.keywordsAuthority
dc.subject.keywordsLeading
dc.subject.keywordsMisinformation
dc.subject.keywordsNonleading
dc.subject.keywordsLaw enforcement
dc.subject.lcshEyewitness identification
dc.subject.lcshAuthority
dc.subject.lcshInformation integrity
dc.subject.lcshMisinformation
dc.thesis.degreeM.A., Psychology
dc.titleCan authority influence misinformation?: the relationship between misinformation and eyewitness accuracyen_US
dc.typeAcademic theses
thesis.degree.grantorJackson College of Graduate Studies

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
GillK2022.pdf
Size:
9.44 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

UCO - Graduate Theses