What's the verdict: how disgust dictates jury verdict and the mitigating role of symbolic cleansing

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorGayzur, Nora
dc.contributor.authorKurbanova, Selbi
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLimke, Alicia, ?d 1979-
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMabry, John
dc.date.accessioned2024-09-12T19:56:43Z
dc.date.available2024-09-12T19:56:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.description.abstractApproximately 1% of the US prison population (about 20,000 individuals) is currently wrongfully convicted (The Innocence Project, 2023). Wrongful convictions are influenced by ambiguous evidence, cognitive heuristics, and moral emotions, which affect legal decision-making (Baldwin & McConville, 1979). The present study assessed the effect of disgust-inducing and cleansing images on mock jury guilt ratings. One hundred fifty-two participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: disgust-inducing and cleansing images, disgust-inducing images only, cleansing images only, and no images. Participants read an ambiguous vignette about a crime and battery charge, then rated the defendant’s guilt on a 7-point Likert scale. The findings showed, in a marginal effect, that exposure to cleansing images following disgust-inducing images resulted in lower guilt ratings, indicating that moral cleansing mitigates heuristics formed by the vignette and disgust-inducing images. The decreased guilt ratings in the group exposed to both cleansing and disgust-inducing images demonstrate the role of symbolic cleansing in moral restoration and reaffirm the link between moral self-assessment restoration and reduced feelings of disgust (Schaefer, 2019). Future studies should explore the impact of more arousing media and different forms of symbolic cleansing to determine how moral cleansing might influence pathogen avoidance responses and lead to fairer sentencing in the criminal justice system.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc(OCoLC)1455636507
dc.identifier.other(AlmaMMSId)9983053611702196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/340623
dc.rightsAll rights reserved by the author, who has granted UCO Chambers Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its online repositories. Contact UCO Chambers Library's Digital Initiatives Working Group at diwg@uco.edu for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.subject.keywordsDecision-making process
dc.subject.keywordsDisgust effect
dc.subject.keywordsJury verdict
dc.subject.keywordsMoral cleansing
dc.subject.keywordsMoral restoration
dc.subject.keywordsSymbolic cleansing
dc.subject.lcshJurors
dc.subject.lcshDecision making
dc.subject.lcshVerdicts
dc.subject.lcshAversion
dc.subject.lcshPurity (Ethics)
dc.thesis.degreeM.S., Forensic Psychology
dc.titleWhat's the verdict: how disgust dictates jury verdict and the mitigating role of symbolic cleansingen_US
dc.typeAcademic theses
thesis.degree.grantorJackson College of Graduate Studies

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
KurbanovaS2024.pdf
Size:
1.07 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

UCO - Graduate Theses