Phubbing in the workplace: stress, social support, and outcomes

dc.contributor.advisorJohnson, Amy
dc.contributor.authorGai, Yizhu
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBisel, Ryan
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCionea, Ioana
dc.contributor.committeeMemberBeutel, Ann
dc.date.accessioned2026-08-06T22:15:18Z
dc.date.embargoExpiration2027-08-06 00:00:00
dc.date.issued2026
dc.date.proquestAvailable01/01/2026
dc.date.updated2026-08-06T22:15:18Z
dc.description.abstractPhubbing, the act of ignoring a co-present interaction partner in favor of one’s mobile phone, has been examined extensively in romantic, family, and peer contexts, but its role in organizational life remains understudied. Drawing on Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and leader-member exchange frameworks, this dissertation conceptualizes phubbing as a form of communicative inattentiveness that disrupts the everyday interactions through which employees acquire and maintain relational resources. A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 400 employed adults recruited through Prolific. Participants reported on supervisor phubbing, their own phubbing, communication-based emotional support (CBES), leader-member conversation quality (LMCQ), burnout, intention to leave, engagement, and multicommunication. Supervisor phubbing was the focal predictor, while employee phubbing was included to control for employees’ own phone-directed inattentiveness and to examine its supplementary associations with employee outcomes and relational resources. Results indicated that supervisor phubbing was positively associated with burnout and intention to leave and negatively associated with engagement after controlling for employee phubbing. Supervisor phubbing was also negatively associated with both CBES and LMCQ. Employee phubbing predicted higher burnout and lower engagement. Contrary to expectations, neither CBES nor LMCQ moderated the relationship between phubbing and employee outcomes, suggesting that these relational resources may be more clearly affected by phubbing than able to buffer its effects. These findings extend COR theory by identifying phubbing as a micro-level communicative mechanism of resource loss and position relational attentiveness as a communicative resource within leader-member relationships.
dc.identifier.orcid0009-0007-4317-2557
dc.identifier.urihttps://shareok.org/handle/11244/342856
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherUniversity of Oklahoma – Graduate College
dc.subjectCommunication
dc.subjectcommunication-based emotional support
dc.subjectconservation of resources theory
dc.subjectemployee burnout
dc.subjectemployee engagement
dc.subjectleader-member conversation quality
dc.subjectsupervisor phubbing
dc.thesis.degreeD.Phil.
dc.titlePhubbing in the workplace: stress, social support, and outcomes
ou.groupCommunication: Arts & Sciences

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Gai_oklahoma_2409A_10913.pdf
Size:
698.85 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
2.01 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: