Making our measures match perceptions: Do severity and type matter when assessing academic misconduct offenses

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorStone, Thomas H.
dc.contributor.authorKisamore, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.authorJawahar, I.M.
dc.contributor.authorBolin, Jocelyn Holden
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-30T14:25:30Z
dc.date.available2022-03-30T14:25:30Z
dc.date.issued2014-09-26
dc.descriptionThe version of record of this article, first published in the Journal of Academic Ethics, is availableen_US
dc.description.abstractTraditional approaches to measurement of violations of academic integrity may overestimate the magnitude and severity of cheating and confound panic with planned cheating. Differences in the severity and level of premeditation of academic integrity violations have largely been unexamined. Results of a study based on a combined sample of business students showed that students are more likely to commit minor cheating offenses and engage in panic-based cheating as compared to serious and planned cheating offenses. Results also indicated there is a significant interaction between severity and type (planned vs. panic) of cheating. We hypothesized serious and planned cheating offenses would be related to justifications and found the largest differences were between panic and planned. Finally, panic and minor cheating were associated with two self-control-related personality traits. Implications for cheating research are discussed.en_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.citationStone, T., Kisamore, J., Jawahar, I.M., & Bolin, J.H. (2014). Making our measures match perceptions: Do severity and type matter when assessing academic misconduct offenses. Journal of Academic Ethics, 12(4), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9216-0en_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-014-9216-0en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/335118
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectacademic misconducten_US
dc.subjectmeasurementen_US
dc.subjectcheatingen_US
dc.subjectintegrityen_US
dc.titleMaking our measures match perceptions: Do severity and type matter when assessing academic misconduct offensesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
ou.groupDodge Family College of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychologyen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
JAET Stone et al. 2014.pdf
Size:
393.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.72 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

OU - Faculty and Staff Publications