Their Day in Court: Assessing Guilty Plea Rates Among Terrorists
Loading...
Date
Authors
Christopher A. Shields
Kelly R. Damphousse
Brent L. Smith
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice
Abstract
Individuals who are charged for traditional crimes are substantially more likely to plead guilty than individuals who are charged under the same statutes but who are officially involved in terrorism (Smith & Damphousse, 1998). Relying on a structural–contextual theory framework, a quantitative analysis not only confirmed that terrorists plead guilty more often than traditional offenders but that the defendant’s age and number of counts in the indictment are important predictors. Directions for future research are suggested.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Shields, C. A., Damphousse, K. R., & Smith, B. L. (2006). Their Day in Court: Assessing Guilty Plea Rates Among Terrorists. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 22(3), 261-276. doi: 10.1177/1043986206292370