Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPedersen, Jon E.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorTurkmen, Hakan.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:19:54Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:19:54Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/915
dc.description.abstractIntegrating technology into teaching and learning in Turkish education is a slow, time-consuming process that requires substantial levels of support and encouragement and requires patience and understanding. In light of efforts by the Turkish government, Turkish faculty members who earned their degrees from western universities, and graduate students earning degrees from American universities will be leaders on the long road to change.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to examine Turkish science teachers and pre-service teachers' attitudes towards the use of technological tools in their science lessons in Turkish colleges of education in the assist of Turkish government projects, and how science education teachers, who have earned a science education degree from western countries, influence the use technology in Turkish higher education.en_US
dc.description.abstractMajor findings of the study include: (1) Science education faculty members who have earned science education degrees from western countries have a positive effect on the use of technological tools in science courses in Turkish higher education. (2) Science education faculty members who have earned science degrees from Turkish universities have a limited knowledge on the use of technological tools in science courses in Turkish higher education. (3) Science education graduate students who have been studying in science education in western countries have positive attitudes for the use of technological tools in science courses have potential to impact Turkish higher education, when they return to Turkey. (4) Most Turkish pre-service teachers know very little about effective use of technology in education. Gender differences are apparent and females consistently indicated that they knew less and hence may not integrate technological tools in their teaching. (5) Turkish pre-service or new teachers are exposed to teacher educators that do not sufficiently model the appropriate use of computers for instructional purposes, either in courses or in field experiences. The technology that is used focuses more on older and simpler instructional applications of computer technology (e.g., computer assisted instruction, word processing) and older educational technologies (e.g., overhead projectors, calculators, slides). (6) Faculty rank in general, made little vis-a-vis technology use in knowledge.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe research method employed were quantitative data sources, including a technology background questionnaire, which is cross-sectional design, and qualitative historical research data sources. The study analyzed the data under a cross-section or between subjects' method with four factors: Turkish science teachers; Turkish pre-service science teachers; Turkish science teachers who have earned science degrees from western universities; and Turkish graduate students whose majors are in science education in U.S. It was anticipated that an analysis of variance (ANOVA) would be used to analyze data and "level 0.05" was established.en_US
dc.format.extentxii, 220 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectScience Study and teaching Turkey Public opinion.en_US
dc.subjectComputer-assisted instruction Turkey Public opinion.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Technology of.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Sciences.en_US
dc.subjectEducation Data processing Turkey Public opinion.en_US
dc.subjectScience Computer-assisted instruction Turkey Public opinion.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Curriculum and Instruction.en_US
dc.subjectStudent teachers Turkey Attitudes.en_US
dc.subjectPublic opinion Turkey.en_US
dc.subjectScience teachers Turkey Attitudes.en_US
dc.titleEducational technology usage and needs of science education in Turkey.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculumen_US
dc.noteAdviser: Jon E. Pedersen.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-08, Section: A, page: 2826.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3186962en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record