Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStoecker, Art
dc.contributor.authorAtta-Asiamah, Ernest
dc.date.accessioned2014-04-15T19:52:30Z
dc.date.available2014-04-15T19:52:30Z
dc.date.issued2010-05-01
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/8657
dc.description.abstractThe city of Kaw City had water problem since the 1990's because of the collapse of the wells and the poor taste of the groundwater. The Aeralator and NF treatment systems would be considered with each has two different sizes with an output of 60 gpm and 150 gpm of water treated assumed to supply Kaw City only and both Kaw City and Shidler respectively. The cost of investment capital was estimated by the sum and product of units cost and quantity of materials and equipment. The operating cost was estimated by summing the chemical, utilities, labor replacement and administration and operations. An amortization factor was used to determine the annual fixed capital cost with the design life of 50 years and rate of 5%. The cost per unit of thousand was determined as the total cost divided by the total design flow rate multiplied by 1000.The cost of amortized capital Aeralator and NF treatment plant of capacity of 60 gpm were estimated to be $14,945/yr and $18,841/yr. The total operating cost of NF treatment plant was $40,384/yr and Aeralator treatment plant was estimated to be $20,908/yr. For treatment plant of capacity of 150 gpm, the annual capital fixed cost of Aeralator system was estimated to be $17,728/yr while NF was estimated to be $28,974/yr water of treated water. Moreover, the total operating cost of Aeralator and NF systems were estimated to be $31,385/yr and $56,846/yr respectively. The annual economic costs of the two treatment system plants were estimated to be $0.62/1000 gallon of Aeralator treatment plant and $1.09/1000 gallon of NF treatment plant. The estimated costs of the NF were more costly than Aeralator system. The investment cost of the layout of the entire city was estimated to be $15.34/ft of the investment cost. The annual fixed cost of the layout of $20,648/yr and CRF of $0.05. Due to economy of scale of treating and supply of water, it is economically more cost effective to supply water to both Kaw City and Shidler and serve cost.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.publisherOklahoma State University
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleEstimation of the Cost of Building a Water Treatment Plant and Related Facilities for Kaw City, Oklahoma
dc.typetext
dc.contributor.committeeMemberSanders, Larry
dc.contributor.committeeMemberWhitacre, Brian
osu.filenameAttaAsiamah_okstate_0664M_10864.pdf
osu.collegeAgricultural Sciences and Natural Resources
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.description.departmentDepartment of Agricultural Economics
dc.type.genreThesis
dc.subject.keywordsaeralator system
dc.subject.keywordscapital cost
dc.subject.keywordschemical cost
dc.subject.keywordscost per thousand
dc.subject.keywordsnanofiltration system
dc.subject.keywordsoperating cost


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record