Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMatthews, William J.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorHargrave, Chad Wesley.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:19:45Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:19:45Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/849
dc.description.abstractStream ecosystem properties and functions are important because they provide services such as water purification, oxygen production, and carbon fixation that help sustain life. Aquatic organisms can affect these properties and functions through different pathways linked to a species trophic and functional characteristics. It is necessary to understand how these ecosystem effects vary among taxa because as aquatic biota change as a result of random, natural, or anthropogenic influences, ecosystems properties and functions are likely to be affected.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research suggests that the population size, the identity of species in the assemblage, as well as the number of species making up the assemblage can be important factors affecting stream ecosystem properties and functions. Chapters 1--3 were conducted in artificial stream mesocosms, and may have limited applicability to natural stream ecosystems where a variety of abiotic factors can influence ecosystems. In Chapter 4, I tested the ecosystem effects of three fish species from different functional groups on PPR, benthic algae biomass (as chlorophyll-a), and benthic invertebrate density in a natural stream ecosystem using field enclosures. Treatments were Blackstripe Topminnow (Fundulus notatus), a surface insectivore; Longear Sunfish (Lepomis megalotis), a watercolumn insectivore; Orangethroat Darter (Etheostoma spectabile), a benthic invertivore; and a fishless control. Primary productivity was greater in all enclosures with fish than in enclosures without fish. Relative to control enclosures, benthic algae biomass was not different in Blackstripe Topminnow treatments, but was greater in Longear Sunfish treatments on both sample days, and was greater in Orangethroat Darter treatments on day 15. Benthic invertebrate abundance was not affected by any of the fish treatments. These data agree with results from previous mesocosm experiments. Thus, despite the limited realism of stream mesocosms, patterns observed in mesocosm experiments are likely to occur in natural stream ecosystems. (Abstract shortened by UMI.)en_US
dc.description.abstractFishes are important consumers in stream ecosystems, having important regulatory roles for many ecosystem properties and functions. In this dissertation, I addressed the effects of fishes on stream ecosystems from three perspectives. I asked (1) if fish ecosystem effects were dependent on local fish density, (2) if fish effects were caused by different species-specific food web pathways, and (3) if co-occurring fish species had facilitative effects on ecosystems when in more specious assemblages.en_US
dc.format.extentxvi, 125 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectAgriculture, Fisheries and Aquaculture.en_US
dc.subjectBiotic communities.en_US
dc.subjectBiology, Ecology.en_US
dc.subjectFishes Speciation.en_US
dc.subjectStream animals.en_US
dc.titleEffects of fish density, identity, and species richness on stream ecosystems.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Biologyen_US
dc.noteAdviser: William J. Matthews.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-02, Section: B, page: 0674.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3163015en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Biology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record