Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDinger, Mary K.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorBehrens, Timothy K.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:19:39Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:19:39Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/841
dc.description.abstractPurposes. The purposes of this study were to (1) examine the validity of participant recorded pedometer step logs, (2) examine the relationship between steps per day and percent bodyfat (% BF), and (3) examine differences in steps per day by BMI category (< 25 m/kg2 vs. ≥ 25 kg/m2). Methods . Participants (N = 89; Male: n = 29, age = 37.97 +/- 9.41 years, BMI = 25.87 +/- 4.42 kg/m2, % BF = 21.66 +/- 6.21%; Female: n = 60, age = 40.07 +/- 10.72, BMI = 24.83 +/- 4.72 kg/m 2, % BF = 33.73 +/- 8.11%) in this cross-sectional, descriptive study simultaneously wore a sealed pedometer, unsealed pedometer, and Actigraph accelerometer for nine consecutive days. Body composition was assessed via air-displacement plethysmography (BOD POD). Descriptive statistics, tests of equivalence, correlation coefficients, and independent t-tests were calculated. Three conditions were examined for validity: raw Actigraph steps per day (RAW) vs. participant recorded steps per day (PSD), Actigraph steps corrected for vehicular travel (CORRECTED) vs. PSD, and total accumulated steps from the sealed pedometer (SEALED) vs. total accumulated steps from the participant recorded pedometer (PTOT). Results. There was a strong correlation between RAW and PSD (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001). However, RAW and PSD were not equivalent. Similarly, CORRECTED and PSD resulted in a strong correlation (r = 0.88, p < 0.0001), but they were not equivalent. Comparing SEALED and PTOT indicated a strong correlation (r = 0.96, p < 0.0001) and equivalence. All correlations for steps per day and % BF were moderate (range: r = 0.40 to 0.45). There was a significant difference in steps per day by BMI category in PSD (p = 0.03), but not in RAW and CORRECTED. Conclusions. These results indicate (1) acceptable validity for participant recorded pedometer step logs, (2) moderate relationships between steps per day and % BF, and (3) a significant difference in steps per day by BMI category in PST, but not in RAW and CORRECTED. Future research should attempt to further explain the relationship between Actigraph and pedometer-derived steps.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 158 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Recreation.en_US
dc.subjectExercise Oklahoma Oklahoma City.en_US
dc.subjectExercise Oklahoma Norman.en_US
dc.subjectHealth Sciences, Public Health.en_US
dc.subjectBody composition.en_US
dc.subjectPedometers.en_US
dc.titleValidity of participant recorded pedometer step logs in free-living adults.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Health and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 66-01, Section: B, page: 0228.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Mary K. Dinger.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3162835en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Health and Exercise Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record