Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVaughn, Courtney Ann,en_US
dc.contributor.advisorO'Hair, Mary John,en_US
dc.contributor.authorCate, Jean L. Mcgregor.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:19:24Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:19:24Z
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/727
dc.description.abstractThe achievement gap of ethnic and poor students has haunted educators, and some schools have narrowed the gap through building learning communities. The purpose of the study was to understand how changes occurred in a traditional school as it transformed into a high-achieving democratic learning community. Newmann and Wehlage (1995) indicated that improved student learning occurred when schools organized as learning communities. Leaders of learning communities who distributed leadership across the community (Spillane, Halverson & Diamond, 1999) and created communities of practice facilitated the learning of both explicit and tacit knowledge across the community (Wenger, 1998) and created conditions that supported new strategies for addressing diverse students' learning needs. Democratic schools were communities in which students experienced authentic learning and democratic practices (Apple & Bean, 1995, O'Hair, McLaughlin & Reitzug, 2000).en_US
dc.description.abstractTo explain how the community changed and evolved, four sets of data were gathered over seventeen years, including documents, in-depth interviews, field notes and a learning-community survey. The analysis of data produced themes and created a historical, interpretive case study (Merriam, 1998) of the processes, interactions and relationships that occurred as the community evolved. When the school joined a university-school network, inquiry erupted and teacher learning began. Through the network, teachers examined the IDEALS of a democratic learning community (O'Hair, et al., 2000). Teachers' learning was shared and leadership skills were built. Communities of practice (Wenger, 1998) were created through book studies, site goals, grade level and vertical teams led by teacher leaders (Lambert, 1998). As teachers inquired their own practice, their knowledge of how to address student needs was enhanced. Communities of practice coordinated and moved knowledge across the community. Through learning, distributed leadership (Spillane, Halverson & Diamond, 1999) and communities of practice, student achievement increased. The school exceeded the achievement scores of much less diverse and lower poverty level schools. Red Bud became an example of a high-achieving school (Haycock, 2001) that closed the gap and provided a model for others. This study told their story.en_US
dc.format.extentxiii, 185 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectEducational change Case studies.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Elementary.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Administration.en_US
dc.subjectEducational change Oklahoma Case studies.en_US
dc.titleEvolution of a high-achieving school: Building community through learning, leading and practices.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Leadership and Policy Studiesen_US
dc.noteMajor Professors: Mary John O'Hair; Courtney Ann Vaughn.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 65-02, Section: A, page: 0357.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3122311en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record