Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRao, Mahesh N.
dc.contributor.authorDung, Elisha Jasper
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-26T08:24:05Z
dc.date.available2013-11-26T08:24:05Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/6768
dc.description.abstractScope and Method of Study: The main goal of this research is to examine long term trends in carbon sequestration in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) tracts in the Central High Plains (CHP) region of the U. S. The second goal is to examine the amount of carbon sequestered in the CRP tracts before they were converted to CRP and compare the two. To achieve these goals, the following objectives are considered: To estimate the carbon sequestration potential in CRP in the CHP using an integrated model, CENTURY and GIS to evaluate rates of carbon sequestration and assess policy strategies and management practices for carbon sequestration in the study area; to compare the estimated amount of carbon sequestered in the study area before and after conversion to CRP; and to project future trends in carbon sequestration, and map the spatial and temporal distribution of carbon sequestration in the CHP.
dc.description.abstractFindings and Conclusions: CENTURY model estimated the total carbon sequestration for the pre-CRP period (1900-1984) as 11958.04 Kt and for the post-CRP period (1985-2010) as 39,682.8 kt; while estimates for same periods by DAYCENT are 21729.80Kt and 38,983.52 kt respectively. Between the pre-CRP and post-CRP periods, however, the CENTURY model indicates a 54% increase in carbon sequestration, while the DAYCENT model estimated only a 28% increase. The overestimation of carbon sequestration by the CENTURY model between the pre-CRP and post-CRP periods may be attributed to the fact that CENTURY runs on a monthly time step while DAYCENT runs on a daily time step. Similarly, the above ground carbon sequestered percentages are 9.7% and 14% for the CENTURY and DAYCENT models respectively; and 90.3% and 86% for below ground percentages for CENTURY and DAYCENT, respectively. The annual rates of carbon sequestration per unit area were also estimated for both models: CENTURY estimated 0.06 Kt per km2 per yr (pre-CRP) and 0.20 kt per km2 per yr (post-CRP); DAYCENT estimates were 0.11 Kt per km2 per yr (pre-CRP) and 0.19 kt per km2 per yr (post-CRP). In conclusion, estimates by the CENTURY and DAYCENT models indicate that the CRP program is effective in sequestering carbon in the CHP region.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleEstimating potential carbon sequestration in Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) tracts in the Central High Plains of the United States
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLightfoot, Dale
dc.contributor.committeeMemberCordova, Carlos E.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberElliott, Norman
dc.contributor.committeeMemberDavis, Craig A.
osu.filenameDung_okstate_0664D_11966.pdf
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.type.genreDissertation
dc.type.materialText
dc.subject.keywordscarbon sequestration
dc.subject.keywordscentury model
dc.subject.keywordsconservation reserve program
dc.subject.keywordsdaycent model
dc.subject.keywordsglobal climate change
dc.subject.keywordsland use
thesis.degree.disciplineGeography
thesis.degree.grantorOklahoma State University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record