Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorBrorsen, B. Wade
dc.contributor.authorShah, Samarth P.
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-26T08:22:05Z
dc.date.available2013-11-26T08:22:05Z
dc.date.issued2011-07
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/6539
dc.description.abstractScope and Method of Study:
dc.description.abstractThe study comprises three essays about the market microstructure of futures and options markets with the main emphasis on liquidity costs. The first essay determines the impact of the transition to electronic trading at the Kansas City Board of Trade (KCBT) wheat futures market. In this essay liquidity costs are estimated for side-by-side trading of open outcry and electronic wheat futures market at KCBT using intraday transaction prices. Factors such as daily volume, volume per trade, volatility and price clustering are used to explain the difference in liquidity costs in the two markets. The second essay attempts to guide the choice problem that agricultural producers face when selecting between futures and options markets to hedge their cash market position. Liquidity costs in KCBT wheat options and futures market are estimated and a new measure of liquidity costs in options markets is proposed. The third essay deals with the liquidity costs of stock and stock index futures and option markets at National Stock Exchange (NSE) of India. The liquidity costs are estimated using the new measure as well as several other measures previously developed in the literature.
dc.description.abstractFindings and Conclusions: The main findings of the first essay are that the electronic wheat futures market has lower liquidity costs for all but the largest traders at KCBT. The key to continued existence of the open outcry market appears to be its ability to handle large orders. The second essay concludes that although, option contracts are often suggested to agricultural producers as an alternative to futures contracts to avoid margin calls, it costs more to trade an option. Regardless of the measure used, the liquidity costs in options markets were at least three times higher compared to the futures markets. A similar difference is found between the liquidity costs in stock and stock index futures and option markets at NSE, India in the third essay. The difference is more prominent in stock index futures and options compared to the individual stock futures and options.
dc.formatapplication/pdf
dc.languageen_US
dc.rightsCopyright is held by the author who has granted the Oklahoma State University Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its institutional repository. Contact Digital Library Services at lib-dls@okstate.edu or 405-744-9161 for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.titleEssays on liquidity costs in futures and options markets
dc.contributor.committeeMemberAnderson, Kim B.
dc.contributor.committeeMemberNorwood, F. Bailey
dc.contributor.committeeMemberKrehbiel, Timothy L.
osu.filenameShah_okstate_0664D_11484
osu.accesstypeOpen Access
dc.type.genreDissertation
dc.type.materialText
thesis.degree.disciplineAgricultural Economics
thesis.degree.grantorOklahoma State University


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record