The influence of legislative fiscal analysts in the state budget process.
Abstract
This research found that the majority of all respondents perceived legislative fiscal analysts to be influential in the state budget process, although different degrees of influence were found among the four states under study. Legislative fiscal analysts are influential in the budget process because they are information providers. In addition to providing basic budgetary information, legislative fiscal analysts are influential because they narrow the range of legislative discussion by identifying issues, developing policy alternatives, and/or making specific budget recommendations. The provision of information can occur through a variety of duties and roles that legislative fiscal analysts perform. The most important duty performed by the legislative fiscal analysts is the review and analysis of agency requests and executive recommendations. Of the various roles that analysts can take on during the budget process such as clerical worker, monitor of expenditures, facilitator of information, and policy initiator, the facilitator role was found to be the most appropriate role for most of the legislative fiscal analysts in this study. The ability of some analysts to make budget recommendations for the legislature, a duty associated with the policy initiator role, gave rise to higher perceived levels of influence for some of those analysts. Expertise in a particular policy area, tenure on the job, frequency of contact with other key budget actors, and visibility in the budget process are also important factors conditioning influence. This study assessed the duties, roles, relationships, and influence of legislative fiscal analysts in the state budget process. Key budget actors including legislative fiscal analysts, legislators, agency personnel, and executive budget analysts were interviewed by telephone in four states, Arizona, Colorado, Kansas, and Maine. The research answers several broad questions. First, what are the primary duties and most useful types of information provided to legislators by legislative fiscal analysts? Second, what are legislative fiscal analyst roles and relationships with legislators, agency personnel, and executive budget analysts? Third, what is the perceived level of legislative fiscal analyst influence? Finally, what are the factors that condition this influence?
Collections
- OU - Dissertations [9319]
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
State claims. Letter from the Acting Secretary of the Treasury transmitting the report of the Third Auditor and Second Comptroller, making allowances to the State of Massachusetts of $26,228.44, and the State of Pennsylvania of $7,546.83, on account of "refunding to States expenses incurred in raising volunteers," and to the State of Texas $148,615.97, on account of "re-imbursement to certain States and Territories for expenses incurred in repelling invasions and suppressing Indian hostilities.".
House of Representatives Executive Document No. 413, 51st Congress, 1st Session (1890) (1890-06-12) -
Indian Trust Bonds. Letter from the Secretary of the Interior, stating the amount of bonds of the State of Virginia, and bonds of other corporations guaranteed by the State of Virginia, held by the United States in trust for certain Indian tribes, and asking for authority to dispose of the same.
House of Representatives Executive Document No. 72, 38th Congress, 2nd Session (1865) (1865-02-23) -
Letter from the Secretary of War, transmitting report of Lieut. Thomas H. Bradley, examiner of state claims, on the claims of states against the United States, in response to an inquiry from the Committee on Claims, United States Senate
Senate Executive Document No. 74, 46th Congress, 2nd Session (1880) (1880-02-09)