Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStoltenberg, Cal,en_US
dc.contributor.authorBass, Charles Frederick.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:31:00Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/6010
dc.description.abstractThe factors that contribute to a military officer's moral and ethical decisions in combat are investigated with a qualitative study of interviews conducted with thirteen veterans. Theories of moral reasoning are discussed from philosophical and psychological standpoints and are then applied to the interview format. Data are then analyzed for patterns and these patterns are linked with those drawn from military and psychological literature. Three patterns demonstrate an officer's need for control over his environment, the responsibility he feels towards his men, and how the officer must live with his decisions post hoc.en_US
dc.format.extentvi, 105 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectWar Moral and ethical aspects.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Clinical.en_US
dc.subjectCombat.en_US
dc.subjectReasoning (Psychology)en_US
dc.subjectMilitary ethics.en_US
dc.titleMorality in combat.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-06, Section: B, page: 3270.en_US
dc.noteMajor Professor: Cal Stoltenberg.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9977952en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record