Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMcDonald, W. Henry,en_US
dc.contributor.authorDoughty, Amie Ann.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:30:55Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:30:55Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5971
dc.description.abstractThis study uses the linguistic concept of markedness as a method for analyzing literature. Because markedness is rarely used when examining literature, I spend the first part of the work explaining the concept and how it can be applied to literature. I discuss the two types of opposition in markedness, binary and scalar, and how they differ in terms of markedness analysis. In an attempt to show the clearest way in which markedness works in the analysis of literature, I work with four novels that have more than one narrator: Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Wide Sargasso Sea by Jean Rhys, Tracks by Louise Erdrich, and As I Lay Dying by William Faulkner. By their very nature, these texts offer an opposition between narrators, an opposition that makes it possible to analyze them using markedness. I argue that markedness works on three levels in these texts: the narrative, the textual, and the cultural. At the narrative level, the oppositions revolve around the narrators. At the textual level, characters and cultures in individual texts form the oppositions. At the cultural level, the form and style of the text and the author's place in his or her own culture are the focus. At all three levels, I argue, markedness analysis shows concretely how the themes of isolation and otherness work in the texts and, further, how these themes are connected among the different levels.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 204 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectLiterature History and criticism.en_US
dc.subjectLiterature, American.en_US
dc.subjectLiterature, Caribbean.en_US
dc.subjectNarration (Rhetoric)en_US
dc.subjectLiterature, Comparative.en_US
dc.subjectLanguage, Linguistics.en_US
dc.subjectLiterature, English.en_US
dc.subjectMarkedness (Linguistics)en_US
dc.titleThe literary mark: Linguistic oppositions and literary analysis.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Englishen_US
dc.noteAdviser: W. Henry McDonald.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 61-05, Section: A, page: 1827.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9972509en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of English


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record