Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCarnevale, David G.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorMareschal, Patrice Marie.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:30:32Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:30:32Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5817
dc.description.abstractThe participant observation portion of my research involved attending the FMCS new mediator training program. This training program consisted of four intensive week-long training sessions. The interview data were derived from 15 semi-structured interviews conducted with the mediators as well as countless informal conversations that took place during the national conference and new mediator training sessions.en_US
dc.description.abstractI used the data collected from secondary sources, informal networking with dispute resolution professionals, participant observation, and qualitative interviews to develop a written survey. I distributed 185 surveys at the FMCS National Professional Development meeting. I received a total of 78 usable surveys, for a 42% response rate.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe interviews and the participant observation suggested that the parties play a crucial role in the outcome of mediation, but the survey results found no direct effect of the parties on any dependent variable. These results are not as contradictory as they initially appear, as the regression results indicate that the parties exert an indirect effect on mediation outcomes. The participant observation and interview data concurred with the survey results indicating that there is no magic set of techniques and strategies which guarantee success.en_US
dc.description.abstractSome interesting results derived from the survey data include the following: (1) the "broad" and "narrow" approaches to mediation are complements to each other rather than substitutes for one another; (2) the survey data failed to establish a connection between the mediators' choice of techniques and strategies and the dependent variable of agreement on a contract; (3) the parties are less likely to seek the help of female mediators to improve their ongoing relationship.en_US
dc.description.abstractMy dissertation examines the entire mediation process in the labor relations context to identify the determinants of successful mediation. This research makes several important methodological, theoretical, and practical contributions to the existing body of knowledge of mediation. Secondary data were derived from the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service's printed documents such as annual reports, task force reports, training manuals, and brochures describing the services provided by the agency. Using these data I was able to infer what factors the agency considers to be critical to mediation success.en_US
dc.format.extentviii, 300 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectPolitical Science, Public Administration.en_US
dc.subjectSociology, Industrial and Labor Relations.en_US
dc.subjectMediation and conciliation, Industrial.en_US
dc.titleIn the eye of the storm: Mediators' perspectives on resolving labor-management conflict.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Political Scienceen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-05, Section: A, page: 1761.en_US
dc.noteChair: David G. Carnevale.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9930534en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Political Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record