Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPace, Terry M.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorJerez, Ricardo Alberto.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:30:30Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:30:30Z
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5799
dc.description.abstractThis study aims to address concerns associated with ethically and legally implied practice of face-to-face supervisor-client contact. A two group, repeat measures design was employed to examine if there are differences between groups on therapy outcome measures, and client's, counselor's, and supervisors perceptions of the impact of face-to-face client-supervisor contact on therapy variables. Repeated measures ANOVAs were used to test group differences and found that there are no significant differences between audiovisual supervision and face-to-face supervisor-client contact when measuring symptom reduction and global functioning. However, the client and the supervisor both perceived that face-to-face client contact by the supervisor would have a greater impact on the outcome of therapy and on the ethical practice of psychotherapy. Implications for ethical, legal and supervisory processes are discussed.en_US
dc.format.extentx, 116 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectPsychotherapist and patient.en_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Clinical.en_US
dc.subjectTherapist and patient.en_US
dc.titleThe effects of face-to-face supervisor-client contact on therapy outcome and the perceptions of the supervisor, counselor, and client.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.noteAdviser: Terry M. Pace.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 60-05, Section: B, page: 2345.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9929552en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record