Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRideout, Roger,en_US
dc.contributor.authorMontandon, Maria Isabel.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:30:18Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:30:18Z
dc.date.issued1998en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5708
dc.description.abstractThe topics most frequently addressed at the Conference were Practice Teaching (20.5%), Pedagogy Curriculum Program (18.0%), Technology (16.6%), Learning Theories (15.2%), Literature (13.1%), and Performance (12.0%). Among the least frequently discussed (2.8% or less) were Piano Materials, History of Piano Pedagogy, Music Education/Piano Pedagogy Relationship, Research in Piano Pedagogy, and Students Participation. Topics related to performance (Medical Problems, Collaborative Performance, Performance Majors) increased in the two last meetings. The format analysis indicated a growth in the teaching demonstration sessions, in the music industry presence, and in the performance teachers' participation. However, the presentation of papers at the meetings decreased.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to identify trends in piano pedagogy in the United States as reflected by the Proceedings of the National Conference on Piano Pedagogy (NCPP), 1981-1995. A content analysis was used to verify the frequency of topics and variation of formats in the Conference. Articles from the papers and committee sessions were classified according to: (1) their nature (self-reflective, reports, research, or scholarly type of article); (2) their content (referring to pedagogy programs or not); and (3) the frequency of topics. A list of 31 categories and sub-categories was compiled.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe format analyses identified the activities that occurred at each Conference, the structures of the teaching demonstrations, and the kinds of committees. An interview with Richard Chronister, the NCPP's executive director, provided further information about the Conference's philosophy and principles.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe findings revealed that the great majority of articles and reports were self-reflective (82.6%). Only 8.8% were research and scholarly papers (7.8%). Articles and reports referring to piano pedagogy programs declined from 100% in 1980 to 38% in 1994.en_US
dc.description.abstractOther trends indicated in the findings included: a shift in focus from pedagogy to performance at the last two meetings; the emphasis on practical topics and activities; the lack of research and scholarly papers; the closer connection between learning theories, practice teaching, and teaching materials at early years of the Conference; a teacher-centered approach in curriculum decisions; and the lack of self-analyzing discussions in the piano pedagogy field.en_US
dc.format.extentxiii, 194 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectMusic.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Music.en_US
dc.subjectPiano Instruction and study Research.en_US
dc.subjectMusicology Methodology.en_US
dc.titleTrends in piano pedagogy as reflected by the proceedings of the National Conference on Piano Pedagogy (1981-1995).en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSchool of Musicen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 59-09, Section: A, page: 3387.en_US
dc.noteAdviser: Roger Rideout.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9905624en_US
ou.groupWeitzenhoffer Family College of Fine Arts::School of Music


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record