Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorElugardo, Reinaldo,en_US
dc.contributor.authorDabbs, Gordon Wesley.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:29:31Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:29:31Z
dc.date.issued1997en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5430
dc.description.abstractThe first few chapters of this dissertation examine traditional explanations of the problem of religious discourse and finds them to be inadequate for a variety of reasons. The traditional explanations are either founded on a problematic metaphysical system or they are internally inconsistent.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe philosophical difficulty with religious discourse centers around the problem of applying descriptive predicates to a transcendent God. This is contrary to most contemporary accounts of the problem of religious language which claim that the problem is within the peculiar genres of religious language, i.e., analogy, metaphor and narrative.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe final two chapters look to metaphor and narrative as answers to the problem of predication. Neither is found to solve the problem and the notion of predicative history is introduced as a way of understanding the application of descriptive predicates to God.en_US
dc.format.extentv, 137 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectLanguage and languages Religious aspects.en_US
dc.subjectReligion, Philosophy of.en_US
dc.subjectTheology.en_US
dc.subjectGod Attributes.en_US
dc.subjectPhilosophy.en_US
dc.subjectReligion Philosophy.en_US
dc.titleDescribing God.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Philosophyen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 58-01, Section: A, page: 0185.en_US
dc.noteMajor Adviser: Reinaldo Elugardo.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI9719905en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Philosophy


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record