Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpigner-littles, Dorscine,en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:29:28Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:29:28Z
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5396
dc.description.abstractUnique skills reported in response to open-ended items reflected the core values and philosophy of the student personnel and student development movement. These skills indicated that practicing CSAOs report a desire to serve the operational needs of students. In contrast, the respondents' identification of the ten highest ranked items and ten lowest ranked items failed to suggest a student orientation.en_US
dc.description.abstractTests of significance revealed that gender, educational background (field related vs. non-field related) and the interaction of the two variables had differential effects on Factor I, while the tests on Factor II revealed no significant differences among the four subgroups. The results indicated that the female CSAO whose training was non-field related had higher means in overall ratings of skills, meaning that they rated each of the skills as being of less importance than the other three groups. They placed a high focus upon the accomplishment of specific tasks that were direct components of the student services functions.en_US
dc.description.abstractFrom a review of pertinent research and literature, a questionnaire was developed and sent to 197 CSAOs at state universities with student populations of 9000 or more. Responses were received from 153 which generated 139 usable questionnares or 71% of the targeted population.en_US
dc.description.abstractFactor analysis of the skills identified from the literature resulted in two principal factors being identified and retained, Conceptual Skills and Technical Skill.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to determine from practitioners, perceptions of the skills most important to Chief Student Affairs Officers (CSAOs), to determine if there were differences in perceptions based upon differences in gender (male vs. female) and educational background (field related vs. non-field related), and to determine if there were skills or competencies perceived as being unique to the field.en_US
dc.description.abstractRanking the skills by mean values revealed that the sample group fundamentally agreed that CSAOs needed human relations skills, basic administrative skills, decision making ability and an organizational sense of the function of student affairs in relation to the whole institution. Seven of the ten competencies that the CSAOs reported as not necessary were skills that could be delegated to subordinates.en_US
dc.format.extentxi, 194 leaves :en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Oklahoma.en_US
dc.subjectStudent activities.en_US
dc.subjectPersonnel management.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher.en_US
dc.titlePerceptions of skills and competencies necessary to become an effective Chief Student Affairs Officer /en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 47-02, Section: A, page: 0438.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI8603520en_US
ou.groupOther


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record