Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBrocato, Frank C.,en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:29:24Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:29:24Z
dc.date.issued1985en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/5375
dc.description.abstractAnalysis of the mean scores of compatible and complementary teams utilizing a t-test revealed a statistically (p. > .05) significant difference in performance of the ambiguous task. Compatible teams performed the task more efficiently, complementary teams performed the task more effectively. These findings were consistent with the alternate hypothesis stated for this task.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe instruments utilized to collect data for the study were the Myers/Briggs Type Indicator and a structured and ambiguous task designed by the researcher. The MBTI was administered to randomly selected superintendent/principal teams in school districts in a southwestern state. From this sample, ten (10) compatible and ten (10) complementary teams were selected to complete the structured and ambiguous task. The structured task utilized in this study was the completion of two school bus routes. The ambiguous task was to review a case study, make a consensual decision, and write a position paper defending that position. Efficiency for both tasks was determined by time in task. Effectiveness of the structured task was determined by the total number of miles required to complete the routes. Effectiveness of the ambiguous task were determined by three judges assigning scores to the position papers based on a predetermined set of criteria.en_US
dc.description.abstractA t-test analysis of the data generated by the structured task revealed there were no statistically significant differences (p. > .05) in the mean efficiency or effectiveness scores of compatible or complementary teams.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study was to test the predictive power of the presumption that suggests groups of complementary (different) psychological types will perform different types of task more efficiently and effectively than groups consisting of compatible (similar) psychological types.en_US
dc.description.abstractImplications for management decisions and roles when compatible and complementary teams exist in organizations are discussed. Implications for the utilization of a complementary task team in a creative organization is also discussed.en_US
dc.format.extentvi, 117 leaves ;en_US
dc.publisherThe University of Oklahoma.en_US
dc.subjectPublic schools Management.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Administration.en_US
dc.titlePsychological type and task accomplishment in the public school management team /en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreeEducat.D.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 46-12, Section: A, page: 3544.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI8602712en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record