Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorKimball, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorCrisostomo, Marisa
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-16T14:11:13Z
dc.date.available2017-05-16T14:11:13Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-12
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/50884
dc.description.abstractPrior research on the Testing Effect has shown that testing previously learned material can result in greater long term memory performance than if the material was restudied (Roediger & Karpicke, 2007). Although the testing can be used as a potent learning event, students seldom use testing as a main study strategy. The following studies attempted to determine if students’ study decisions can be influenced by experience of two different study strategies, one more optimal than the other, such that students choose to retrieve more often. The present experiments had participants either retrieve or restudy cue-target word pairs then make a future study decision about whether to retrieve or restudy items. The results suggest that differential experience of study strategies is not necessary to improve study decisions and that study decisions may be resistant to change.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectCognitive Psychologyen_US
dc.titleImproving Study Strategies Through Testing Experienceen_US
dc.contributor.committeeMemberGronlund, Scott
dc.contributor.committeeMemberTerry, Robert
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMendoza, Jorge
dc.contributor.committeeMemberStewart, Sepideh
dc.date.manuscript2017-05-08
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Psychologyen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record