dc.description.abstract | The high cost of access to space has been a problem since the beginning of the
space age. Most attempts to reduce this cost are centered on improvements to
launch vehicle design. While this approach has been fruitful, less attention has
been paid to other causes of high cost. Two of these are wastage of launch vehicle
payload capacity and use of cost-ineffective launch vehicles. Both of these are
associated with the way the launch vehicles are operated, and so are operational
losses. This work examines the extent of operational losses in space launch over
the period January 1, 2000, to September 29, 2013, and considers strategies for
reducing these losses. The cumulative worldwide wastage for this period was 654
tons, which is 20.4% of total payload capacity, and represents a financial loss of no
less than $8.72 billion (2014$). The cumulative loss due to cost-ineffective launch
vehicle selection is less certain, but is no greater than 43.8% of total launch
cost, or $19.3 billion. Two possible strategies may combat operational losses:
changing launch vehicle selection or rearranging payloads. Changing launch ve-
hicle selection can in principle eliminate cost-ineffective launch vehicle use, but
is prevented in some measure by non-economic considerations. Rearrangement
of payloads cannot eliminate wastage, but can reduce it considerably, to as little
as 2% in some cases. Combining these two strategies by applying a bin-packing
algorithm to the set of launch vehicles and payloads can yield a considerable cost
savings, reducing total launch costs to geosynchronous orbit by as much as 53%
if both launch vehicle selection and payload arrangement are unrestricted. Even
in the most restrictive scenario where payloads must be launched in the same
calendar year they actually were and launch vehicle choice is restricted to the
launch vehicles actually used during that year, cost savings of 19.1% over the
actual launches are possible. | en_US |