Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFink, L. Dee,en_US
dc.contributor.advisorKolar, Randall L.,en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfe, Vickie Lynn.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:18:31Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:18:31Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/443
dc.description.abstractIn order to examine the extent to which four-year institutions in the U.S. provide for the environmental education of students in nonenvironmental majors, and to identify various approaches to increasing environmental literacy at the college level, chief academic officers at these institutions were surveyed electronically. Of the 496 responding institutions (representing a 42.3 percent response rate), 11.6 percent indicated that an "environmental literacy" course was required of all students, and 55.0 percent reported that such a course was available and countable toward the institution's general education requirements. At least one "environmental" minor (e.g. Environmental Science, Environmental Studies) was offered at 33.7 percent of the institutions. Thirty-nine percent reported the existence of an "environmental" academic program that offered a course appropriate for non-majors.en_US
dc.description.abstractVarious approaches to achieving environmental literacy at the college level are discussed, as are statistical differences in survey responses (1) among Carnegie classifications, from Research to Baccalaureate; (2) between public and private institutions; and (3) among geographical regions. Generally, proportions of positive responses were greater among Research institutions than among the other Carnegie categories, and among public than private institutions.en_US
dc.description.abstractAlso explored are ways in which higher education institutions can enhance environmental education at the K--12 level, as well as some of the obstacles to such efforts. Brief overviews are provided of several higher education institutions' activities in the area of K--12 environmental education, either in the form of direct outreach to K--12 students, teacher training (pre-service or in-service), or both. Methods used by some of the programs to assess their success are discussed briefly, as are impediments to higher education institutions' enhancement of K--12 environmental education. Prominent among these impediments are funding and the traditional higher education faculty rewards system. Factors relevant to the latter are addressed; they include the extent to which the institution's mission recognizes a commitment to collaboration with the public schools; the recency of the institution's emphasis on K--12 collaboration; the institution's organizational and governance structure; and the size of the institution.en_US
dc.format.extentxii, 307 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher Research.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Elementary.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Elementary Research.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Higher.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Curriculum and Instruction.en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental education.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Sciences.en_US
dc.titleStudies of the content and process of environmental education.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineSchool of Civil Engineering and Environmental Scienceen_US
dc.noteMajor Professors: Randall L. Kolar; L. Dee Fink.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 63-02, Section: A, page: 0491.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3042512en_US
ou.groupCollege of Engineering::School of Civil Engineering and Environmental Science


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record