Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorOrmsbee, Christine,en_US
dc.contributor.authorRose, James Lee.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:18:24Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:18:24Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/376
dc.description.abstractThis three-year investigation sought to answer two primary questions. First, a teacher survey, addressing accommodation-making, teacher training, student participation and accountability, was administered to special educators over a three-year period, prior to and after the implementation of PL 105-17, Reauthorization of IDEA-1997. During this three-year period, teachers received annual training regarding assessing students with special needs. Training came in the form of a quarterly newsletter, direct teacher in-service training, and experiential opportunities through the implementation of the IDEA-97 assessment requirements. Secondly, special educators were administered five vignettes, each depicting a student with various needs. Teachers were asked to identify each student's area of disability, type of accommodation the student most likely needed, and to list all possible accommodation(s) they thought would be appropriate for the identified student when participating in a state mandated assessment.en_US
dc.description.abstractTeachers responding to the vignette study experienced very little difficulty identifying a student's area of disability, or the area of accommodation making. However, they experienced great difficulty identifying appropriate accommodations for students with disabilities of low incidence, i.e., mental retardation and multiple disabilities.en_US
dc.description.abstractResults indicated special educators readily made accommodations for students with special needs but sometimes felt they were too time-consuming. During Year 1 of the survey, teachers indicated they would gladly participate in training but less so by Year 3. Teachers in general believe students with special needs should have accommodations made available to them alone and not to the general education student population as well. Finally, teachers vacillated on the questions regarding accountability. In general, teachers expressed concerns about student performance being a reflection of their teaching skills.en_US
dc.format.extentvii, 145 leaves ;en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Special.en_US
dc.subjectEducational tests and measurements Public opinion.en_US
dc.subjectStudents with disabilities Rating of.en_US
dc.subjectEducational tests and measurements.en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Tests and Measurements.en_US
dc.subjectTeachers of children with disabilities Attitudes.en_US
dc.titleState-mandated assessments: Teacher perceptions and accomodation-making.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Educational Psychologyen_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-10, Section: A, page: 3348.en_US
dc.noteChair: Christine Ormsbee.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3028804en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Educational Psychology


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record