Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDunn, Loraine,en_US
dc.contributor.authorTabor, Susan Elaine.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-08-16T12:18:22Z
dc.date.available2013-08-16T12:18:22Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/355
dc.description.abstractWhen centers varied by region, rural centers scored lower, however rural centers were not necessarily worse than urban centers. When centers varied by auspice, non-profits scored lower, however non-profit centers were not necessarily worse than for-profit centers.en_US
dc.description.abstractDependent variables included structural aspects of child care environments, e.g., licensed capacity, enrollment, group size, teacher:child ratios, number of Master teachers and teacher and director education, experience, and income. Process quality dependent variables included environmental quality, developmentally appropriate practices, teacher beliefs about professional beliefs and practices, and director beliefs about leadership as well as teachers' beliefs about their director's leadership.en_US
dc.description.abstractStructural quality dependent variable analyses indicated accredited centers had larger group sizes, and more Master teachers than other Star levels. Two-Star centers had more Master teachers than One-Star centers. General education and specialized background in ece/cd of teacher and directors was higher when staff worked in accredited centers, rather than in One- or Two-Star centers. Teacher income from their jobs was higher for those working in accredited centers than those working in One- or Two-Star centers.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe study compared 71 child care centers, matched by geographic region and auspice. It utilized a quasi-experimental design. Chi-square, univariate and multivariate analysis of variance were the primary statistical analyses conducted. Approximately 39% of the centers were rural, and 61% were urban. By auspice, there were no significant differences in the distribution of One-, Two-Star or accredited centers in either rural or urban settings. By region, there were significant differences in the distribution of One-, Two-Star or accredited centers in either nonprofit or for-profit settings. Accredited centers in both urban and rural areas were more likely to be non-profit than for-profit. In both rural and urban areas, One- and Two-Star centers were more likely to be for-profit.en_US
dc.description.abstractTeacher/director specialized education in ece/cd, teacher/director child care income, group size and the number of Master teachers correlated with quality and the presence of developmentally appropriate practices. Director child care income correlated with director leadership.en_US
dc.description.abstractProcess quality dependent variables analyses indicated accredited programs scored higher on classroom environmental quality, developmentally appropriate practices, and teacher beliefs and practices regarding professionalism.en_US
dc.format.extentxiv, 217 leaves :en_US
dc.subjectEducation, Early Childhood.en_US
dc.subjectDay care centers Oklahoma.en_US
dc.titleA comparison of one-star, two-star, and accredited child care programs in Oklahoma.en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.thesis.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.thesis.degreeDisciplineDepartment of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculumen_US
dc.noteChair: Loraine Dunn.en_US
dc.noteSource: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 62-06, Section: A, page: 2023.en_US
ou.identifier(UMI)AAI3018340en_US
ou.groupJeannine Rainbolt College of Education::Department of Instructional Leadership and Academic Curriculum


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record