Loading...
Thumbnail Image

Date

2024-12-13

Journal Title

Journal ISSN

Volume Title

Publisher

Creative Commons
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International

To better understand the characteristics of storms produced by forecast models and those seen in observations, contiguous and nearly contiguous radar objects with reflectivity above a convective threshold were identified and their shapes analyzed. The area, aspect ratio, orientation angle and maximum reflectivity within the object were calculated. For all members of the High Resolution Ensemble Forecast system, the modeled and observed storm objects had similar distributions in area-aspect ratio space. Modeled storm objects had a preferred band of maximum reflectivity that was not seen in the observed storm objects. The modeled storm objects also had a more north-south orientation than observed. Despite these differences, the shape characteristics of the modeled storm objects were still close enough to modeled storm objects to proceed with the creation of an MCS identification and tracking algorithm. The identification algorithm was based on one developed for MCS identification and tracking of observed storms at the NOAA Storm Prediction Center. A novel tracking algorithm was developed based on continuous swaths of maximum reflectivity and tuned to match expert labeling. Together, the identification and tracking algorithm produced a one year spatial distribution of MCSs that was somewhat consistent with an observed climatology. Additional verification of the identification and tracking algorithm revealed an underforecast from all of the models. At both the diurnal and annual scale, the models generally did not match the shape of the observed distribution. Matching the forecast MCSs with observed MCSs further showed low bias, though the forecasts did have very low FAR. The tuned parameters did not necessarily improve the forecast compared to the default parameters. The positional error between the modeled and observed MCSs showed that when the model produced an MCS, it was usually close to an observed MCS and oriented the same direction as the observed MCS.

Description

Keywords

mesoscale convective system, forecast verification, forecast evaluation

Citation

DOI

Related file

Notes

Sponsorship