Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHu, Xiao-Ming
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Yongjie
dc.contributor.authorXue, Ming
dc.contributor.authorMartin, E.
dc.contributor.authorHong, Yang
dc.contributor.authorChen, Mengye
dc.contributor.authorNovoa, H. M.
dc.contributor.authorMcPherson, R.
dc.contributor.authorPerez, Andres
dc.contributor.authorMorales, Isaac
dc.contributor.authorLuna, Auria
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-05T19:06:06Z
dc.date.available2023-07-05T19:06:06Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.identifier.citationHu, X.-M., Huang, Y., Xue, M., Martin, E., Hong, Y., Chen, M., et al. (2023). Effects of lower troposphere vertical mixing on simulated clouds and precipitation over the Amazon during the wet season. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 128, e2023JD038553. https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038553en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/337846
dc.description.abstractPlanetary boundary layer (PBL) schemes parameterize unresolved turbulent mixing within the PBL and free troposphere (FT). Previous studies reported that precipitation simulation over the Amazon in South America is quite sensitive to PBL schemes and the exact relationship between the turbulent mixing and precipitation processes is, however, not disentangled. In this study, regional climate simulations over the Amazon in January-February 2019 are examined at process level to understand the precipitation sensitivity to PBL scheme. The focus is on two PBL schemes, the Yonsei University (YSU) scheme, and the asymmetric convective model v2 (ACM2) scheme, which show the largest difference in the simulated precipitation. During daytime, while the FT clouds simulated by YSU dissipate, clouds simulated by ACM2 maintain because of enhanced moisture supply due to the enhanced vertical moisture relay transport process: 1) vertical mixing within PBL transports surface moisture to the PBL top, and 2) FT mixing feeds the moisture into the FT cloud deck. Due to the thick cloud deck over Amazon simulated by ACM2, surface radiative heating is reduced and consequently the convective available potential energy (CAPE) is reduced. As a result, precipitation is weaker from ACM2. Two key parameters dictating the vertical mixing are identified, p, an exponent determining boundary layer mixing and λ, a scale dictating FT mixing. Sensitivity simulations with altered p, λ, and other treatments within YSU and ACM2 confirm the precipitation sensitivity. The FT mixing in the presence of clouds appears most critical to explain the sensitivity between YSU and ACM2.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was primarily supported by grant no. 20163646499 from the Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa (UNSA) of Peru through the IREES/LASI Global Change and Human Health Institute. The first author is partially supported by the National Mesonet Program grant #10558200 and DOE ASR project (DE-SC0021159). Ming Xue was also supported by NSF grants AGS-1917701.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectcloudsen_US
dc.subjectprecipitationen_US
dc.subjectfree troposphere vertical mixingen_US
dc.subjectregional climate dynamical downscalingen_US
dc.titleEffects of lower troposphere vertical mixing on simulated clouds and precipitation over the Amazon during the wet seasonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1029/2023JD038553en_US
ou.groupCollege of Atmospheric and Geographic Sciencesen_US
dc.description.notesAn edited version of this paper was published by AGU. Published 2023, American Geophysical Union. Preprint available at https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167458066.61800879/v1en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record