Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLee, C. Aujean
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-07T19:17:12Z
dc.date.available2023-03-07T19:17:12Z
dc.date.issued2022-09-02
dc.identifier.citationLee, C. (2022). Who gets hired at the top?: The academic caste system theory in the planning academy. Journal of Planning Education and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221121611.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/337066
dc.description.abstractThis study is the first to examine detailed faculty demographics and impacts of elite hiring networks in the planning academy. Institutional prestige significantly shapes faculty placements. Nearly half of planning faculty graduated from Berkeley, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Cornell, and University of North Carolina (UNC)-Chapel Hill. Faculty are predominantly hired in similar or lower ranking programs with little upward mobility, after accounting for demographics and program factors. While race and gender did not have a significant relationship to placements, the findings demonstrate how status-based inequities are perpetuated through elite programs and constrain faculty representation.en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjecthiringen_US
dc.subjectacademic caste systemen_US
dc.subjectplanning educationen_US
dc.subjecthiring networken_US
dc.subjectethicsen_US
dc.titleWho Gets Hired at the Top? The Academic Caste System Theory in the Planning Academyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221121611en_US
ou.groupChristopher C. Gibbs College of Architectureen_US
dc.description.notesThis is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by SAGE in the Journal of Planning Education and Research, Copyright © 2022 C. Aujean Lee DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X221121611.en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record