The Digital Critical Apparatus: Thoughts from the Field

Huskey, Samuel; Cayless, Hugh

dc.contributor.author	Huskey, Samuel
dc.contributor.author	Cayless, Hugh
dc.date.accessioned	2022-12-02T20:17:04Z
dc.date.available	2022-12-02T20:17:04Z
dc.date.issued	2022
dc.identifier.citation	Huskey, S. J. and Cayless, H. 2022. "The Digital Critical Apparatus: Thoughts from the Field." The Classical Journal 117.3: 340–358.	en_US
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/11244/336712
dc.description.abstract	In this article, we continue the discussion about the future of critical editions begun in volume 112 of The Classical Journal by Keeline and continued in volume 114 by Olson. Written from the point of view of two scholars working in the field of digital philology, the article affirms some elements of Keeline’s vision and addresses Olson’s concerns about that vision. Concrete examples from an active pro-ject that seeks to translate the visual elements of traditional critical editions into machine-readable data reveal that Keeline and Olson’s views are not as far apart as they seem.	en_US
dc.description.abstract	Copyright © 2022 The Classical Association of the Middle West and South. This article first appeared in The Classical Journal, Volume 117, Issue 3, February-March, 2022, pages 337-355. Published by Johns Hopkins University Press for The Classical Association of the Middle West and South.	en_US
dc.language	en_US	en_US
dc.rights	Attribution 4.0 International	*
dc.rights.uri	https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Digital Scholarly Editions	en_US
dc.title	The Digital Critical Apparatus: Thoughts from the Field	en_US
dc.type	Article	en_US
dc.description.peerreview	Yes	en_US
dc.description.peerreviewnotes	The article was reviewed by an anonymous reviewer.	en_US
dc.identifier.doi	http://doi.org/10.1353/tcj.2022.0003	en_US
ou.group	Dodge Family College of Arts and Sciences::Department of Classics and Letters	en_US