Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMaass, Jaclyn
dc.contributor.authorFranks, Marisa
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-21T14:22:26Z
dc.date.available2022-07-21T14:22:26Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.other(AlmaMMSId)9982871710502196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/335950
dc.description.abstractPre-trial publicity can result in juror bias, memory errors, and biased perceptions, leading to issues within trials and jury deliberation. It is nearly impossible to avoid due to media and that publicity having multiple outlets to share information. Multiple methods have been researched in their ability to reduce the effects of PTP, but only minimally. Past research has found that PTP increases the likelihood of a guilty verdict and exposure to it will decrease the chance of a fair trial with impartial jurors. This study examines how negative PTP regarding specific people affects the predicted length of deliberation, rate of guilty verdicts, and predicted confidence in final decisions. A total of 106 participants were recruited for this study, with an average of 26 participants in each of the four conditions. Participants were recruited through a campus-wide email blast. The survey consisted of demographic questions, article summaries pertaining to the defendant, victim, both, or crime in general, and an edited video of the NJ vs. Bias trial. Participants then completed a survey containing questions about the verdict they believed they would choose, the verdict they believed the jury would choose, their confidence in those decisions, whether they believed the PTP affected their decisions and would affect the jury’s decision, and whether PTP should be limited or restricted before and during trials. There were no significant results for predicted deliberation times, predicted jury verdicts, individual decisions, or confidence ratings between any PTP exposure conditions. Results of this study do not indicate that PTP regarding different subjects has significant effects on juror decisions and predicted jury verdicts. However, changes to exposure time and retention intervals could potentially yield different results if a similar study is performed again in the future. Future research should focus on creating more real-world jury simulations in order to gain a greater understanding of PTP’s effects and how to mitigate them.en_US
dc.rightsAll rights reserved by the author, who has granted UCO Chambers Library the non-exclusive right to share this material in its online repositories. Contact UCO Chambers Library's Digital Initiatives Working Group at diwg@uco.edu for the permission policy on the use, reproduction or distribution of this material.
dc.subject.lcshJury
dc.subject.lcshDecision making
dc.subject.lcshFree press and fair trial
dc.titleThe effects of pre-trial publicity on the predictions of duration of jury deliberationen_US
dc.typeAcademic theses
dc.contributor.committeeMemberLimke-McLean, Alicia
dc.contributor.committeeMemberMabry, John
dc.thesis.degreeM.S., Forensic Psychology
dc.subject.keywordsGuilt ratings
dc.subject.keywordsJury deliberation
dc.subject.keywordsPre-trial publicity
dc.subject.keywordsPriming
dc.identifier.oclc(OCoLC)1336930438
thesis.degree.grantorJackson College of Graduate Studies


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record