Comparison of selected recovery techniques on grip strength and endurance following a simulated static hang

Abstract

Due to the growing popularity of sports climbing and other grip strength dependent sports, there has been increasing interest in determining the best method of intermittent recovery during extended climbing bouts in order to help combat forearm and finger flexor fatigue. The two main methods utilized by climbers to do so are 'shaking out' and passive stretching via wrist and finger extension. Presumably, these techniques are used to reduce the occluded arterial inflow brought upon by intramuscular pressure, which reduces oxygenation of the active muscles.

Methods: 44 college-age males and females were randomly assigned to 3 groups: 'shaking out', stretching, and resting (control) with the arms at the side. Prior to assessing a maximal hang time, each participant's grip strength was measured. Subsequently, each participant was asked to hang by the proximal interphalangeal joints of digits 2-5 for maximal time. Following the maximal hang time the participants performed, one of the three protocols for 30 s and grip strength was again assessed and a second maximal hang time was recorded. Data was compared by repeated measures ANOVA with an alpha level set at p<0.05.

Results: There were no significant differences among pre- grip strength results between the groups and no significant (p>0.05) differences from pre- to post grip strength assessments for any of the conditions. However, the shake and stretch conditions recorded slightly larger post-test grip deficits (-13.3% and -13.1% respectively) than the rest condition (-8.1%). For maximal hang time no pre-hang significant (p>0.05) differences were found among the conditions. However, each condition registered significant (p<0.05) pre- to posttest changes and no significant differences were found among the conditions.

Conclusion: While the rest condition resulted in slightly less grip strength fatigue following maximal hang time, post-hang time was not affected by any of the conditions presented in this research. These results suggest that none of the protocols used in the current study is superior in reducing occlusion and restoring of muscle oxygenation.