Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMansky, Joseph
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-23T20:16:26Z
dc.date.available2020-10-23T20:16:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-03
dc.identifier.citationMansky, Joseph.“‘Look no more’: Jonson’s Catiline and the Politics of Enargeia,” PMLA 134.2 (2019): pp .332–350.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11244/325627
dc.description.abstractIn his play Catiline His Conspiracy, Ben Jonson allegorizes Cicero’s fight to save the Roman Republic as a battle against the kind of spectacular drama that, Jonson claimed, his audiences so enjoyed. This metatheatrical polemic hinges on the rhetorical technique of enargeia: the power of language to conjure an image. For the early moderns, enargeia resolved the “paradox of representation”—the contradiction between “making present” and “standing for”—by subordinating visual presence to verbal illusionism. Jonson, aligning neoclassical poetics with humanist historiography, dramatizes this hierarchy of representation. In Catiline, Cicero’s rhetoric puts visions of violence before his audience’s eyes only to prevent their realization onstage. The play thus seeks to exorcise the specter of political violence that haunted early modern England and the Roman Republic alike. Yet the rhetoric of Jonson’s Cicero proves just as coercive as the spectacular violence that it has replaced. From Jonson’s time to ours, separating rhetoric from violence has remained the challenge of republicanism. (JM)en_US
dc.languageen_USen_US
dc.subjectBen Jonsonen_US
dc.subjectCiceroen_US
dc.subjectElizabethan dramaen_US
dc.subjectEnargeiaen_US
dc.subjectCatiline His Conspiracyen_US
dc.title“Look No More”: Jonson’s Catiline and the Politics of Enargeiaen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.description.peerreviewYesen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1632/pmla.2019.134.2.332en_US
ou.groupCollege of Arts and Sciences::Department of Englishen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record